Back to Search Start Over

First stage of labour management practices: A survey of Australian obstetric providers.

Authors :
White L
Lee N
Beckmann M
Source :
The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology [Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol] 2017 Jun; Vol. 57 (3), pp. 266-271. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Aug 17.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Aims: To report on the opinions and reported practices of Australian obstetricians and general practice (GP) obstetricians, in the definition and management of spontaneous first stage of labour, in low-risk nulliparous women.<br />Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional survey sent electronically to all Australian Specialist obstetricians (FRANZCOG) and Diplomates. Respondents answered questions regarding care of nulliparous women in spontaneous labour at term across three domains: (i) practitioners' characteristics; (ii) current practice; (iii) opinion regarding joint statement by ACOG/SMFM (Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine) 'Safe prevention of primary caesarean section'.<br />Results: The dataset included responses from 664 participants, representing 29% of Specialists and 11% of Diplomates. Responses varied in the criteria used to define normal labour, and the diagnosis and management of prolonged labour. Clinicians with more post-qualification experience considered the minimal acceptable progress to be faster than those with fewer years of experience (P = 0.02). Clinicians working in higher acuity hospitals were more likely to augment labour for longer prior to recommending a caesarean section for active phase arrest, compared to those in lower acuity hospitals (P = 0.025). The majority of respondents (58.2%) already based their practice on the ACOG/SMFM 'Safe prevention of primary caesarean section' statement, or would now consider changing their practice.<br />Conclusion: There is a lack of consensus among Australian obstetricians and GP obstetricians regarding definition of normal progress in first stage of labour and how to manage abnormal progress; however, many are open to new recommendations for practice.<br /> (© 2016 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1479-828X
Volume :
57
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27530804
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12510