Back to Search
Start Over
A proposed predictive model for advanced fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B and its validation.
- Source :
-
Medicine [Medicine (Baltimore)] 2016 Aug; Vol. 95 (35), pp. e4679. - Publication Year :
- 2016
-
Abstract
- We created a predictive model using serum-based biomarkers for advanced fibrosis (F3 or more) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and to confirm the accuracy in an independent cohort.A total of 249 CHB patients were analyzed. To achieve our study aim, a training group (n = 125) and a validation group (n = 124) were formed. In the training group, parameters related to the presence of advanced fibrosis in univariate and multivariate analyses were examined, and a formula for advanced fibrosis was created. Next, we verified the applicability of the predictive model in the validation group.Multivariate analysis identified that gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT, P = 0.0343) and platelet count (P = 0.0034) were significant predictors of the presence of advanced fibrosis, while Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2-binding protein (WFA-M2BP, P = 0.0741) and hyaluronic acid (P = 0.0916) tended to be significant factors. Using these 4 parameters, we created the following formula: GMPH score = -0.755 - (0.015 × GGT) - (0.268 × WFA-M2BP) + (0.167 × platelet count) + (0.003 × hyaluronic acid). In 8 analyzed variables (WFA-M2BP, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, FIB-4 index, prothrombin time, platelet count, hyaluronic acid, Forns index, and GMPH score), GMPH score had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve for advanced fibrosis with a value of 0.8064 in the training group and in the validation group, GMPH score also had the highest AUROC (0.7782). In all subgroup analyses of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) status (HB surface antigen quantification, HBV-DNA quantification, and HBe antigen seropositivity), GMPH score in F3 or F4 was significantly lower than that in F0 to F2. In the above mentioned 8 variables, differences between the liver fibrosis stages (F0 to F1 vs F2, F2 vs F3, F3 vs F4, F0 to F1 vs F3, F0 to F1 vs F4, and F2 vs F4) for the entire cohort (n = 249) were all significant only in GMPH score.In conclusion, the GMPH scoring system may be helpful for detecting advanced liver fibrosis in patients with CHB.<br />Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
- Subjects :
- Antigens, Neoplasm blood
Female
Hepatitis B Surface Antigens blood
Hepatitis B e Antigens blood
Hepatitis B, Chronic blood
Humans
Hyaluronic Acid blood
Liver Cirrhosis blood
Male
Membrane Glycoproteins blood
Middle Aged
Plant Lectins blood
Platelet Count
Receptors, N-Acetylglucosamine blood
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
gamma-Glutamyltransferase blood
Biomarkers blood
Hepatitis B, Chronic pathology
Liver Cirrhosis diagnosis
Models, Statistical
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1536-5964
- Volume :
- 95
- Issue :
- 35
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Medicine
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 27583895
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004679