Back to Search Start Over

Variation in Hospital-Specific Rates of Suboptimal Lymphadenectomy and Survival in Colon Cancer: Evidence from the National Cancer Data Base.

Authors :
Becerra AZ
Berho ME
Probst CP
Aquina CT
Tejani MA
Gonzalez MG
Xu Z
Swanger AA
Noyes K
Monson JR
Fleming FJ
Source :
Annals of surgical oncology [Ann Surg Oncol] 2016 Dec; Vol. 23 (Suppl 5), pp. 674-683. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Sep 09.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Background: Little is known about between-hospital differences in the rate of suboptimal lymphadenectomy. This study characterizes variation in hospital-specific rates of suboptimal lymphadenectomy and its effect on overall survival in a national hospital-based registry.<br />Methods: Stage I-III colon cancer patients were identified from the 2003-2012 National Cancer Data Base. Bayesian multilevel logistic regression models were used to assess the impact of patient- and hospital-level factors on hospital-specific rates of suboptimal lymphadenectomy (<12 lymph nodes), and multilevel Cox models were used to estimate the effect of suboptimal lymphadenectomy at the patient (yes vs. no) and hospital level (quartiles of hospital-specific rates) on overall survival.<br />Results: A total of 360,846 patients across 1345 hospitals in the US met the inclusion criteria, of which 25 % had a suboptimal lymphadenectomy. Wide variation was observed in hospital-specific rates of suboptimal lymphadenectomy (range 0-82 %, median 44 %). Older age, male sex, comorbidity score, no insurance, positive margins, lower tumor grade, lower T and N stage, and sigmoid and left colectomy were associated with higher odds of suboptimal lymphadenectomy. Patients treated at lower-volume and non-academic hospitals had higher odds of suboptimal lymphadenectomy. Patient- and hospital-level factors explained 5 % of the between-hospital variability in suboptimal lymphadenectomy, leaving 95 % unexplained. Higher suboptimal lymphadenectomy rates were associated with worse survival (quartile 4 vs. quartile 1: hazard ratio 1.19, 95 % confidence interval 1.16-1.22).<br />Conclusion: Large differences in hospital-specific rates of suboptimal lymphadenectomy were observed, and this variation was associated with survival. Quality improvement initiatives targeting hospital-level adherence to the national standard may improve overall survival among resected colon cancer patients.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1534-4681
Volume :
23
Issue :
Suppl 5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of surgical oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27613558
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5551-2