Back to Search Start Over

Gastrointestinal tract anastomoses with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring: is it still a valid technique for bowel anastomosis? Analysis of 203 cases and review of the literature.

Authors :
Bobkiewicz A
Studniarek A
Krokowicz L
Szmyt K
Borejsza-Wysocki M
Szmeja J
Marciniak R
Drews M
Banasiewicz T
Source :
International journal of colorectal disease [Int J Colorectal Dis] 2017 Jan; Vol. 32 (1), pp. 107-111. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Sep 30.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Purpose: Biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR) is an alternative to manual and stapled anastomoses performed within the upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) tract. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of BAR utility for bowel anastomoses based on our own material.<br />Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed to a total of 203 patients who underwent bowel surgery with the use of BAR anastomosis within upper and lower gastrointestinal tract between 2004 and 2014. Data for the analysis was collected based on medical records, treatment protocols, and the results of histological examinations.<br />Results: The study group consisted of 86 women and 117 men. The most common underlying pathology was a malignant disease (n = 165). Biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR) size 31 was the most commonly used (n = 87). A total of 169 colocolic or colorectal anastomoses and 28 ileocolic and 8 enteroenteric anastomoses were performed. The mortality rate was 0.5 % (n = 1) whereas re-surgery rate within 30 days was 8.4 % (n = 17). Twenty-eight patients developed perioperative complications with surgical site infection as the most common one (n = 11). Eight patients developed specific complications associated with BAR including an anastomotic leak (n = 6) and intestinal obstruction (n = 2). The mean time of hospital stay after surgery was 12.7 days.<br />Conclusions: The use of BAR for the GI tract anastomoses is simple and rapid method and it is characterized with an acceptable number of perioperative mortality and complication rates. Based on our experience, we recommend the use of BAR anastomosis in different types of intestinal anastomosis in varying clinical scenarios.<br />Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-1262
Volume :
32
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of colorectal disease
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27695974
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2661-z