Back to Search Start Over

Shift from intravenous or 16% subcutaneous replacement therapy to 20% subcutaneous immunoglobulin in patients with primary antibody deficiencies.

Authors :
Canessa C
Iacopelli J
Pecoraro A
Spadaro G
Matucci A
Milito C
Vultaggio A
Agostini C
Cinetto F
Danieli MG
Gambini S
Marasco C
Trizzino A
Vacca A
De Mattia D
Martire B
Plebani A
Di Gioacchino M
Gatta A
Finocchi A
Licciardi F
Martino S
De Carli M
Moschese V
Azzari C
Source :
International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology [Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol] 2017 Mar; Vol. 30 (1), pp. 73-82. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Dec 07.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

In patients with primary antibody deficiencies, subcutaneous administration of IgG (SCIG) replacement is effective, safe, well-tolerated, and can be self-administered at home. A new SCIG replacement at 20% concentration (Hizentra <superscript>®</superscript> ) has been developed and has replaced Vivaglobin <superscript>®</superscript> (SCIG 16%). An observational prospective multi-centric open-label study, with retrospective comparison was conducted in 15 Italian centers, in order to investigate whether and to what extent switching to Hizentra <superscript>®</superscript> would affect frequency of infusions, number of infusion sites, patients' satisfaction, and tolerability in patients previously treated with Vivaglobin <superscript>®</superscript> or intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG). Any variations of dosage, frequency and duration of the infusions, and of number of infusion sites induced by Hizentra <superscript>®</superscript> with respect to the former treatment were recorded. Practical advantages and disadvantages of Hizentra <superscript>®</superscript> , with respect to the medicinal product formerly used, and the variations in patients' therapy-related satisfaction were monitored by means of the TSQM (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication); number, frequency, and duration of infectious events and adverse effects were recorded. Eighty-two patients switched to Hizentra <superscript>®</superscript> : 19 (23.2%) from IVIG and 63 (76.8%) from Vivaglobin <superscript>®</superscript> . The mean interval between infusions was not affected by the shift (7.0 ± 2.0 days with previous treatment versus 7.1 ± 1.2 during Hizentra <superscript>®</superscript> ). A decrease in the number of infusion sites with Hizentra <superscript>®</superscript> was recorded in 12 out of 56 patients for whom these data were available. At 6 months, 89.7% of patients were satisfied with Hizentra <superscript>®</superscript> ; no difference in terms of effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction was observed. No difference in the incidence of adverse events was reported.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2058-7384
Volume :
30
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27927705
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0394632016681577