Back to Search Start Over

Value of preoperative biliary drainage on postoperative outcome after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A case-control study.

Authors :
El Nakeeb A
Salem A
Mahdy Y
El Dosoky M
Said R
Ellatif MA
Ezzat H
Elsabbagh AM
Hamed H
Alah TA
El Ebidy G
Source :
Asian journal of surgery [Asian J Surg] 2018 Mar; Vol. 41 (2), pp. 155-162. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Dec 09.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background/objective: The potential benefit of preoperative biliary drainage (PBD) on postoperative outcomes remains controversial. The aim of this study was to elucidate surgical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in patients with PBD and to show the impact of bilirubin level.<br />Methods: We retrospectively studied all patients who underwent PD in our center between January 2003 and June 2015. Patients were divided into: Group A (PBD) and Group B (no PBD). The primary outcome was the rate of postoperative complication.<br />Results: A total of 588 cases underwent PD. Group A included 314 (53.4%) patients while Group B included 274 (46.6%) patients. The overall incidence of complications and its severity were higher in Group A (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02). There was significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (p = 0.002), delayed gastric emptying (p = 0.005), biliary leakage (p = 0.04), abdominal collection (p = 0.04), and wound infection (p = 0.04) in Group A. The mean length of hospital stay was significantly longer in Group A than in Group B (12.86 ± 7.65 days vs. 11.05 ± 7.98 days, p = 0.01). No significant impact of preoperative bilirubin level on surgical outcome was detected.<br />Conclusion: PBD before PD was associated with major postoperative complications and stent-related complications.<br /> (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Taiwan.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0219-3108
Volume :
41
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Asian journal of surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
27955973
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2016.10.004