Back to Search
Start Over
Benchtop quantification of gutter formation and compression of chimney stent grafts in relation to renal flow in chimney endovascular aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm sealing configurations.
- Source :
-
Journal of vascular surgery [J Vasc Surg] 2017 Nov; Vol. 66 (5), pp. 1565-1573.e1. Date of Electronic Publication: 2016 Dec 14. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Background: The chimney technique has been successfully used to treat juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. The two main issues with this technique are gutter formation and chimney graft (CG) compression, which induce a risk for type Ia endoleaks and stent thrombosis, respectively. In this benchtop study, the geometry and renal artery flow of chimney endovascular aneurysm repair configurations were compared with chimney configurations with endovascular aneurysm sealing (ch-EVAS).<br />Methods: Seven flow phantoms were constructed, including one control and six chimney endovascular aneurysm repairs (Endurant [Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, Minn] and AFX [Endologix Inc, Irvine, Calif]) or ch-EVAS (Nellix, Endologix) configurations, combined with either balloon-expandable or self-expanding CGs with an intended higher positioning of the right CG in comparison to the left CG. Geometric analysis was based on measurements at three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and included gutter volume and CG compression, quantified by the ratio between maximal and minimal diameter (D-ratio). In addition, renal artery flow was studied in a physiologic flow model and compared with the control.<br />Results: The average gutter volume was 343.5 ± 142.0 mm <superscript>3</superscript> , with the lowest gutter volume in the EVAS-Viabahn (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) combination (102.6 mm <superscript>3</superscript> ) and the largest in the AFX-Advanta V12 (Atrium Medical Corporation, Hudson, NH) configuration (559.6 mm <superscript>3</superscript> ). The maximum D-ratio was larger in self-expanding CGs than in balloon-expandable CGs in all configurations (2.02 ± 0.34 vs 1.39 ± 0.13). The CG compression had minimal influence on renal volumetric flow (right, 390.7 ± 29.4 mL/min vs 455.1 mL/min; left, 423.9 ± 28.3 mL/min vs 410.0 mL/min in the control).<br />Conclusions: This study showed that gutter volume was lowest in ch-EVAS in combination with a Viabahn CG. CG compression was lower in configurations with the Advanta V12 than with Viabahn. Renal flow is unrestricted by CG compression.<br /> (Copyright © 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Aorta, Abdominal diagnostic imaging
Aorta, Abdominal physiopathology
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal diagnostic imaging
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal physiopathology
Aortography methods
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation adverse effects
Computed Tomography Angiography
Endoleak etiology
Endoleak physiopathology
Endovascular Procedures adverse effects
Humans
Materials Testing
Models, Anatomic
Prosthesis Design
Renal Artery diagnostic imaging
Risk Factors
Thrombosis etiology
Thrombosis physiopathology
Treatment Outcome
Vascular Patency
Aorta, Abdominal surgery
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal surgery
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation instrumentation
Endovascular Procedures instrumentation
Models, Cardiovascular
Renal Artery physiopathology
Renal Circulation
Stents
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1097-6809
- Volume :
- 66
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of vascular surgery
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 27988156
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2016.10.058