Back to Search Start Over

Assessing exercise cardiac reserve using real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors :
Le TT
Bryant JA
Ting AE
Ho PY
Su B
Teo RC
Gan JS
Chung YC
O'Regan DP
Cook SA
Chin CW
Source :
Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance [J Cardiovasc Magn Reson] 2017 Jan 23; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 7. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jan 23.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background: Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance (ExCMR) has great potential for clinical use but its development has been limited by a lack of compatible equipment and robust real-time imaging techniques. We developed an exCMR protocol using an in-scanner cycle ergometer and assessed its performance in differentiating athletes from non-athletes.<br />Methods: Free-breathing real-time CMR (1.5T Aera, Siemens) was performed in 11 athletes (5 males; median age 29 [IQR: 28-39] years) and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (7 males; median age 26 [interquartile range (IQR): 25-33] years). All participants underwent an in-scanner exercise protocol on a CMR compatible cycle ergometer (Lode BV, the Netherlands), with an initial workload of 25W followed by 25W-increment every minute. In 20 individuals, exercise capacity was also evaluated by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Scan-rescan reproducibility was assessed in 10 individuals, at least 7 days apart.<br />Results: The exCMR protocol demonstrated excellent scan-rescan (cardiac index (CI): 0.2 ± 0.5L/min/m <superscript>2</superscript> ) and inter-observer (ventricular volumes: 1.2 ± 5.3mL) reproducibility. CI derived from exCMR and CPET had excellent correlation (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) and agreement (1.7 ± 1.8L/min/m <superscript>2</superscript> ). Despite similar values at rest (P = 0.87), athletes had increased exercise CI compared to healthy individuals (at peak exercise: 12.2 [IQR: 10.2-13.5] L/min/m <superscript>2</superscript> versus 8.9 [IQR: 7.5-10.1] L/min/m <superscript>2</superscript> , respectively; P < 0.001). Peak exercise CI, where image acquisition lasted 13-17 s, outperformed that at rest (c-statistics = 0.95 [95% confidence interval: 0.87-1.00] versus 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.72], respectively; P < 0.0001 for comparison) in differentiating athletes from healthy volunteers; and had similar performance as VO <subscript>2max</subscript> (c-statistics = 0.84 [95% confidence interval = 0.62-1.00]; P = 0.29 for comparison).<br />Conclusions: We have developed a novel in-scanner exCMR protocol using real-time CMR that is highly reproducible. It may now be developed for clinical use for physiological studies of the heart and circulation.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-429X
Volume :
19
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28110638
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0322-1