Back to Search
Start Over
Assessing exercise cardiac reserve using real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
- Source :
-
Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance [J Cardiovasc Magn Reson] 2017 Jan 23; Vol. 19 (1), pp. 7. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jan 23. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Background: Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance (ExCMR) has great potential for clinical use but its development has been limited by a lack of compatible equipment and robust real-time imaging techniques. We developed an exCMR protocol using an in-scanner cycle ergometer and assessed its performance in differentiating athletes from non-athletes.<br />Methods: Free-breathing real-time CMR (1.5T Aera, Siemens) was performed in 11 athletes (5 males; median age 29 [IQR: 28-39] years) and 16 age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (7 males; median age 26 [interquartile range (IQR): 25-33] years). All participants underwent an in-scanner exercise protocol on a CMR compatible cycle ergometer (Lode BV, the Netherlands), with an initial workload of 25W followed by 25W-increment every minute. In 20 individuals, exercise capacity was also evaluated by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Scan-rescan reproducibility was assessed in 10 individuals, at least 7 days apart.<br />Results: The exCMR protocol demonstrated excellent scan-rescan (cardiac index (CI): 0.2 ± 0.5L/min/m <superscript>2</superscript> ) and inter-observer (ventricular volumes: 1.2 ± 5.3mL) reproducibility. CI derived from exCMR and CPET had excellent correlation (r = 0.83, p < 0.001) and agreement (1.7 ± 1.8L/min/m <superscript>2</superscript> ). Despite similar values at rest (P = 0.87), athletes had increased exercise CI compared to healthy individuals (at peak exercise: 12.2 [IQR: 10.2-13.5] L/min/m <superscript>2</superscript> versus 8.9 [IQR: 7.5-10.1] L/min/m <superscript>2</superscript> , respectively; P < 0.001). Peak exercise CI, where image acquisition lasted 13-17 s, outperformed that at rest (c-statistics = 0.95 [95% confidence interval: 0.87-1.00] versus 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.23-0.72], respectively; P < 0.0001 for comparison) in differentiating athletes from healthy volunteers; and had similar performance as VO <subscript>2max</subscript> (c-statistics = 0.84 [95% confidence interval = 0.62-1.00]; P = 0.29 for comparison).<br />Conclusions: We have developed a novel in-scanner exCMR protocol using real-time CMR that is highly reproducible. It may now be developed for clinical use for physiological studies of the heart and circulation.
- Subjects :
- Adult
Bicycling
Blood Pressure
Cardiac Output
Case-Control Studies
Exercise Tolerance
Feasibility Studies
Female
Heart physiology
Heart Rate
Humans
Male
Observer Variation
Predictive Value of Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Respiration
Supine Position
Time Factors
Athletes
Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Exercise Test instrumentation
Heart diagnostic imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Physical Endurance
Ventricular Function, Left
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1532-429X
- Volume :
- 19
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28110638
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-017-0322-1