Back to Search Start Over

Nasal highflow eliminates CO 2 from lower airways.

Authors :
Bräunlich J
Goldner F
Wirtz H
Source :
Respiratory physiology & neurobiology [Respir Physiol Neurobiol] 2017 Aug; Vol. 242, pp. 86-88. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Apr 07.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Introduction: Nasal highflow (NHF) has a growing evidence in treatment of hypoxemic respiratory failure. There are preliminary data available about use in acute and chronic type-II-respiratory failure. Unfortunately underlying mechanisms of NHF are not well understood. Increase in airway pressure seems too small to explain the observed reduction in hypercapnia. Most interesting effects are wash-out of upper airways and reduction of functional dead space. There are no data available about a wash-out of lower airways.<br />Methods: We established a sheep lung model to evaluate CO <subscript>2</subscript> -wash-out in lower airways. Therefore we placed measuring and insufflation catheter in maximal expanded lung. The lung was not ventilated in order to minimize influence of CO <subscript>2</subscript> rebreathing and increase in airway pressure. Airway pressure and CO <subscript>2</subscript> values were measured in lower airways and in tracheal space.<br />Results: CO <subscript>2</subscript> was decreased by NHF in lower airways and in tracheal space. Changes in CO <subscript>2</subscript> were flow dependent. There was also an increase in airway pressure in these settings.<br />Conclusions: NHF is able to decrease CO <subscript>2</subscript> in lower airways in a flow-dependent manner. This effect is independent of an increase in airway pressure and CO <subscript>2</subscript> -rebreathing. So wash-out is an important reason for efficiency of NHF in decreasing hypercapnia.<br /> (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1878-1519
Volume :
242
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Respiratory physiology & neurobiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28396200
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2017.03.012