Back to Search Start Over

Prevalence and outcome of patients with cancer and acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a BleeMACS substudy.

Authors :
Iannaccone M
D'Ascenzo F
Vadalà P
Wilton SB
Noussan P
Colombo F
Raposeiras Roubín S
Abu Assi E
González-Juanatey JR
Simao Henriques JP
Saucedo J
Kikkert WJ
Nuñez-Gil I
Ariza-Sole A
Song XT
Alexopoulos D
Liebetrau C
Kawaji T
Moretti C
Garbo R
Huczek Z
Nie SP
Fujii T
Correia LC
Kawashiri MA
García Acuña JM
Southern D
Alfonso E
Terol B
Garay A
Zhang D
Chen Y
Xanthopoulou I
Osman N
Möllmann H
Shiomi H
Giordana F
Kowara M
Filipiak K
Wang X
Yan Y
Fan JY
Ikari Y
Nakahashi T
Sakata K
Gaita F
Yamagishi M
Kalpak O
Kedev S
Source :
European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care [Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care] 2018 Oct; Vol. 7 (7), pp. 631-638. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jun 08.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: The prevalence and outcome of patients with cancer that experience acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have to be determined.<br />Methods and Results: The BleeMACS project is a multicentre observational registry enrolling patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention worldwide in 15 hospitals. The primary endpoint was a composite event of death and re-infarction after one year of follow-up. Bleedings were the secondary endpoint. 15,401 patients were enrolled, 926 (6.4%) in the cancer group and 14,475 (93.6%) in the group of patients without cancer. Patients with cancer were older (70.8±10.3 vs. 62.8±12.1 years, P<0.001) with more severe comorbidities and presented more frequently with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared with patients without cancer. After one year, patients with cancer more often experienced the composite endpoint (15.2% vs. 5.3%, P<0.001) and bleedings (6.5% vs. 3%, P<0.001). At multiple regression analysis the presence of cancer was the strongest independent predictor for the primary endpoint (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1, 1.8-2.5, P<0.001) and bleedings (HR 1.5, 1.1-2.1, P=0.015). Despite patients with cancer generally being undertreated, beta-blockers (relative risk (RR) 0.6, 0.4-0.9, P=0.05), angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (RR 0.5, 0.3-0.8, P=0.02), statins (RR 0.3, 0.2-0.5, P<0.001) and dual antiplatelet therapy (RR 0.5, 0.3-0.9, P=0.05) were shown to be protective factors, while proton pump inhibitors (RR 1, 0.6-1.5, P=0.9) were neutral.<br />Conclusion: Cancer has a non-negligible prevalence in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, with a major risk of cardiovascular events and bleedings. Moreover, these patients are often undertreated from clinical despite medical therapy seems to be protective. Registration:The BleeMACS project (NCT02466854).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2048-8734
Volume :
7
Issue :
7
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28593789
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872617706501