Back to Search Start Over

Resident Experiences With Implementation of the I-PASS Handoff Bundle.

Authors :
Coffey M
Thomson K
Li SA
Bismilla Z
Starmer AJ
O'Toole JK
Blankenburg RL
Rosenbluth G
Cole FS
Yu CE
Hepps JH
Sectish TC
Spector ND
Srivastava R
Allen AD
Mahant S
Landrigan CP
Source :
Journal of graduate medical education [J Grad Med Educ] 2017 Jun; Vol. 9 (3), pp. 313-320.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background: The I-PASS Handoff Study found that introduction of a handoff bundle (handoff and teamwork training for residents, a mnemonic, a handoff tool, a faculty development program, and a sustainability campaign) at 9 pediatrics residency programs was associated with improved communication and patient safety.<br />Objective: This parallel qualitative study aimed to understand resident experiences with I-PASS and to inform future implementation and sustainability strategies.<br />Methods: Resident experiences with I-PASS were explored in focus groups (Nā€‰=ā€‰50 residents) at 8 hospitals throughout 2012-2013. A content analysis of transcripts was conducted following the principles of grounded theory.<br />Results: Residents generally accepted I-PASS as an ideal format for handoffs, and valued learning a structured approach. Across all sites, residents reported full adherence to I-PASS when observed, but selective adherence in usual practice. Residents adhered more closely when patients were complex, teams were unfamiliar, and during evening handoff. Residents reported using elements of the I-PASS mnemonic variably, with Illness Severity and Action Items most consistently used, but Synthesis by Receiver least used, except when observed. Most residents were receptive to the electronic handoff tool, but perceptions about usability varied across sites. Experiences with observation and feedback were mixed. Concern about efficiency commonly influenced attitudes about I-PASS.<br />Conclusions: Residents generally supported I-PASS implementation, but adherence was influenced by patient type, context, and individual and team factors. Our findings could inform future implementation, particularly around the areas of resident engagement in change, sensitivity to resident level, perceived efficiency, and faculty observation.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1949-8357
Volume :
9
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of graduate medical education
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28638509
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00616.1