Back to Search
Start Over
Radiological evaluation of maxillary sinus anatomy: A cross-sectional study of 300 patients.
- Source :
-
Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft [Ann Anat] 2017 Nov; Vol. 214, pp. 1-8. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jul 29. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the principal anatomical characteristics of the maxillary sinus using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in order to facilitate prevention of intra- and post-operative complications.<br />Materials and Methods: Three hundred CBCT scans from patients undergoing implant surgery were analysed. The following anatomical structures were evaluated: (1) Residual ridge height (RRH) and width (RRW); (2) Ridge bone density (BD); (3) Maxillary sinus angle (MSA); (4) Maxillary sinus lateral wall thickness (LWT); (5) Schneiderian membrane thickness (MT); (6) Maxillary sinus septa (SS); (7) Posterior superior alveolar artery (PSAA).'<br />Results: Mean patient age was 59.5±13.6. Mean RRH at upper second premolar (2PM) was 8.66±3.95mm, 4.90±2.28mm at first molar (1M), and 5.26±2.13mm at second molar (2M). Mean RRW was 6.72±2.69mm at 2PM, 6.87±2.65mm at 1M and 7.09±2.80mm at 2M. Bone density was 330.93±211.02 Hounsfield Units (HU) at first molar position and MSA was 73.39±15.23°. LWT was 1.95±0.98mm. Mean Schneider Membrane thickness (MT) was 1.82±1.59mm; MT was ≤3mm in 72.9% of patients and >3mm in 27.10%. 20.56% of patients presented bucco-palatal oriented septa with a mean height of 13.11±3.82mm. PSAA was observed in 48.60% and mean distance to the top of the ridge was 13.15±3.71mm, and was mostly observed inside the sinus (53.85%).<br />Conclusions: CBCT scanning has been shown to be a useful tool for evaluating maxillary sinus anatomical variations. CBCT should be considered the gold standard when evaluating the maxillary sinus area.<br /> (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.)
- Subjects :
- Computer Simulation
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography methods
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Models, Anatomic
Models, Biological
Models, Statistical
Observer Variation
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted methods
Radiography, Dental methods
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Sex Characteristics
Anatomic Landmarks anatomy & histology
Anatomic Landmarks diagnostic imaging
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography standards
Maxillary Sinus anatomy & histology
Maxillary Sinus diagnostic imaging
Radiography, Dental standards
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1618-0402
- Volume :
- 214
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28759740
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2017.06.002