Back to Search Start Over

Improved diagnostic yield compared with targeted gene sequencing panels suggests a role for whole-genome sequencing as a first-tier genetic test.

Authors :
Lionel AC
Costain G
Monfared N
Walker S
Reuter MS
Hosseini SM
Thiruvahindrapuram B
Merico D
Jobling R
Nalpathamkalam T
Pellecchia G
Sung WWL
Wang Z
Bikangaga P
Boelman C
Carter MT
Cordeiro D
Cytrynbaum C
Dell SD
Dhir P
Dowling JJ
Heon E
Hewson S
Hiraki L
Inbar-Feigenberg M
Klatt R
Kronick J
Laxer RM
Licht C
MacDonald H
Mercimek-Andrews S
Mendoza-Londono R
Piscione T
Schneider R
Schulze A
Silverman E
Siriwardena K
Snead OC
Sondheimer N
Sutherland J
Vincent A
Wasserman JD
Weksberg R
Shuman C
Carew C
Szego MJ
Hayeems RZ
Basran R
Stavropoulos DJ
Ray PN
Bowdin S
Meyn MS
Cohn RD
Scherer SW
Marshall CR
Source :
Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics [Genet Med] 2018 Apr; Vol. 20 (4), pp. 435-443. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Aug 03.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

PurposeGenetic testing is an integral diagnostic component of pediatric medicine. Standard of care is often a time-consuming stepwise approach involving chromosomal microarray analysis and targeted gene sequencing panels, which can be costly and inconclusive. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides a comprehensive testing platform that has the potential to streamline genetic assessments, but there are limited comparative data to guide its clinical use.MethodsWe prospectively recruited 103 patients from pediatric non-genetic subspecialty clinics, each with a clinical phenotype suggestive of an underlying genetic disorder, and compared the diagnostic yield and coverage of WGS with those of conventional genetic testing.ResultsWGS identified diagnostic variants in 41% of individuals, representing a significant increase over conventional testing results (24%; Pā€‰=ā€‰0.01). Genes clinically sequenced in the cohort (nā€‰=ā€‰1,226) were well covered by WGS, with a median exonic coverage of 40 × ±8 × (mean ±SD). All the molecular diagnoses made by conventional methods were captured by WGS. The 18 new diagnoses made with WGS included structural and non-exonic sequence variants not detectable with whole-exome sequencing, and confirmed recent disease associations with the genes PIGG, RNU4ATAC, TRIO, and UNC13A.ConclusionWGS as a primary clinical test provided a higher diagnostic yield than conventional genetic testing in a clinically heterogeneous cohort.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1530-0366
Volume :
20
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28771251
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2017.119