Back to Search Start Over

Comparative Effectiveness of Intra-Articular Hyaluronic Acid and Corticosteroid Injections on the Time to Surgical Knee Procedures.

Authors :
Shewale AR
Barnes CL
Fischbach LA
Ounpraseuth ST
Painter JT
Martin BC
Source :
The Journal of arthroplasty [J Arthroplasty] 2017 Dec; Vol. 32 (12), pp. 3591-3597.e24. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Jul 14.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Background: Use of intra-articular hyaluronic acid (HA) injections to manage knee osteoarthritis (OA) remains controversial because of weak and conflicting evidence. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of intra-articular HA injections for knee OA management.<br />Methods: A nested cohort of persons with knee OA seeing a specialist was created using a 10% random sample of LifeLink Plus claims (2010-2015) to compare the risk of composite (any) knee surgical interventions, total (TKA)/unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and TKA only among HA users and 2 comparison groups: corticosteroid (CS) users and HA/CS nonusers. A high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) was used to match HA users with CS users and with HA/CS nonusers on background covariates. The risk of surgical interventions among HA users relative to the comparison groups was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models.<br />Results: Among 13,849 patients, 797 were HA users, 5327 were CS users, and 7725 were HA/CS nonusers. After hdPS matching, the risk of composite surgical interventions did not differ between HA users and HA/CS nonusers (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67-1.16) and CS users (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.65-1.12). Seven of the 8 sensitivity analyses demonstrated no significant benefit among HA users compared to CS users and HA/CS nonusers. A sensitivity analysis that restricted the study cohort to those who ultimately have knee surgery showed a lower risk of surgery of HA (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.95).<br />Conclusion: There were no significant differences in the risk of surgical interventions among HA users compared to HA/CS nonusers and CS users after accounting for residual confounding using an hdPS.<br /> (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-8406
Volume :
32
Issue :
12
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of arthroplasty
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28781020
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.007