Back to Search Start Over

The effect of renal denervation on arterial stiffness, central blood pressure and heart rate variability in treatment resistant essential hypertension: a substudy of a randomized sham-controlled double-blinded trial (the ReSET trial).

Authors :
Peters CD
Mathiassen ON
Vase H
Bech Nørgaard J
Christensen KL
Schroeder AP
Rickers HJVH
Opstrup UK
Poulsen PL
Langfeldt S
Andersen G
Hansen KW
Bøtker HE
Engholm M
Bertelsen JB
Pedersen EB
Kaltoft A
Buus NH
Source :
Blood pressure [Blood Press] 2017 Dec; Vol. 26 (6), pp. 366-380. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Aug 23.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate, whether renal denervation (RDN) improves arterial stiffness, central blood pressure (C-BP) and heart rate variability (HRV) in patients with treatment resistant hypertension.<br />Methods: ReSET was a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blinded trial (NCT01459900). RDN was performed by a single experienced operator using the Medtronic unipolar Symplicity Flex <superscript>TM</superscript> catheter. C-BP, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV), and HRV were obtained at baseline and after six months with the SphygmoCor <superscript>®</superscript> -device.<br />Results: Fifty-three patients (77% of the ReSET-cohort) were included in this substudy. The groups were similar at baseline (SHAM/RDN): n = 27/n = 26; 78/65% males; age 59 ± 9/54 ± 8 years (mean ± SD); systolic brachial BP 158 ± 18/154 ± 17 mmHg; systolic 24-hour ambulatory BP 153 ± 14/151 ± 13 mmHg. Changes in PWV (0.1 ± 1.9 (SHAM) vs. -0.6 ± 1.3 (RDN) m/s), systolic C-BP (-2 ± 17 (SHAM) vs. -8 ± 16 (RDN) mmHg), diastolic C-BP (-2 ± 9 (SHAM) vs. -5 ± 9 (RDN) mmHg), and augmentation index (0.7 ± 7.0 (SHAM) vs. 1.0 ± 7.4 (RDN) %) were not significantly different after six months. Changes in HRV-parameters were also not significantly different. Baseline HRV or PWV did not predict BP-response after RDN.<br />Conclusions: In a sham-controlled setting, there were no significant effects of RDN on arterial stiffness, C-BP and HRV. Thus, the idea of BP-independent effects of RDN on large arteries and cardiac autonomic activity is not supported.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1651-1999
Volume :
26
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Blood pressure
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28830251
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/08037051.2017.1368368