Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of 18 F-FET PET and perfusion-weighted MRI for glioma grading: a hybrid PET/MR study.

Authors :
Verger A
Filss CP
Lohmann P
Stoffels G
Sabel M
Wittsack HJ
Kops ER
Galldiks N
Fink GR
Shah NJ
Langen KJ
Source :
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging [Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging] 2017 Dec; Vol. 44 (13), pp. 2257-2265. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Aug 22.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Purpose: Both perfusion-weighted MR imaging (PWI) and O-(2- <superscript>18</superscript> F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET ( <superscript>18</superscript> F-FET) provide grading information in cerebral gliomas. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic value of <superscript>18</superscript> F-FET PET and PWI for tumor grading in a series of patients with newly diagnosed, untreated gliomas using an integrated PET/MR scanner.<br />Methods: Seventy-two patients with untreated gliomas [22 low-grade gliomas (LGG), and 50 high-grade gliomas (HGG)] were investigated with <superscript>18</superscript> F-FET PET and PWI using a hybrid PET/MR scanner. After visual inspection of PET and PWI maps (rCBV, rCBF, MTT), volumes of interest (VOIs) with a diameter of 16 mm were centered upon the maximum of abnormality in the tumor area in each modality and the contralateral unaffected hemisphere. Mean and maximum tumor-to-brain ratios (TBR <subscript>mean</subscript> , TBR <subscript>max</subscript> ) were calculated. In addition, Time-to-Peak (TTP) and slopes of time-activity curves were calculated for <superscript>18</superscript> F-FET PET. Diagnostic accuracies of <superscript>18</superscript> F-FET PET and PWI for differentiating low-grade glioma (LGG) from high-grade glioma (HGG) were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analyses (area under the curve; AUC).<br />Results: The diagnostic accuracy of <superscript>18</superscript> F-FET PET and PWI to discriminate LGG from HGG was similar with highest AUC values for TBR <subscript>mean</subscript> and TBR <subscript>max</subscript> of <superscript>18</superscript> F-FET PET uptake (0.80, 0.83) and for TBR <subscript>mean</subscript> and TBR <subscript>max</subscript> of rCBV (0.80, 0.81). In case of increased signal in the tumor area with both methods (n = 32), local hot-spots were incongruent in 25 patients (78%) with a mean distance of 10.6 ± 9.5 mm. Dynamic FET PET and combination of different parameters did not further improve diagnostic accuracy.<br />Conclusions: Both <superscript>18</superscript> F-FET PET and PWI discriminate LGG from HGG with similar diagnostic performance. Regional abnormalities in the tumor area are usually not congruent indicating that tumor grading by <superscript>18</superscript> F-FET PET and PWI is based on different pathophysiological phenomena.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1619-7089
Volume :
44
Issue :
13
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28831534
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3812-3