Inflammatory response and peritoneal contamination after transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) versus mini-laparotomy: a porcine in vivo study.

MLA

Senft, Jonas D., et al. “Inflammatory Response and Peritoneal Contamination after Transrectal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) versus Mini-Laparotomy: A Porcine in Vivo Study.” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 32, no. 3, Mar. 2018, pp. 1336–43. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5811-7.

APA

Senft, J. D., Dröscher, T., Gath, P., Müller, P. C., Billeter, A., Müller-Stich, B. P., & Linke, G. R. (2018). Inflammatory response and peritoneal contamination after transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) versus mini-laparotomy: a porcine in vivo study. Surgical Endoscopy, 32(3), 1336–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5811-7

Chicago

Senft, Jonas D, Tilman Dröscher, Philip Gath, Philip C Müller, Adrian Billeter, Beat P Müller-Stich, and Georg R Linke. 2018. “Inflammatory Response and Peritoneal Contamination after Transrectal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) versus Mini-Laparotomy: A Porcine in Vivo Study.” Surgical Endoscopy 32 (3): 1336–43. doi:10.1007/s00464-017-5811-7.