Back to Search Start Over

No. 348-Joint SOGC-CCMG Guideline: Update on Prenatal Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy, Fetal Anomalies, and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes.

Authors :
Audibert F
De Bie I
Johnson JA
Okun N
Wilson RD
Armour C
Chitayat D
Kim R
Source :
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC [J Obstet Gynaecol Can] 2017 Sep; Vol. 39 (9), pp. 805-817.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Objective: To review the available prenatal screening options in light of the recent technical advances and to provide an update of previous guidelines in the field of prenatal screening.<br />Intended Users: Health care providers involved in prenatal screening, including general practitioners, obstetricians, midwives, maternal fetal medicine specialists, geneticists, and radiologists.<br />Target Population: All pregnant women receiving counselling and providing informed consent for prenatal screening.<br />Evidence: Published literature was retrieved through searches of Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library in and prior to March 2016 using an appropriate controlled vocabulary (prenatal diagnosis, amniocentesis, chorionic villi sampling, non-invasive prenatal screening) and key words (prenatal screening, prenatal genetic counselling). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized control trials/controlled clinical trials, and observational studies written in English and published from January 1985 to May 2016. Searches were updated on a regular basis and incorporated in the guideline. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified through searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology-related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical speciality societies.<br />Guideline Update: Evidence will be reviewed 5 years after publication to determine whether all or part of the guideline should be updated. However, if important new evidence is published prior to the 5-year cycle, the review process may be accelerated for a more rapid update of some recommendations.<br /> (Copyright © 2017 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1701-2163
Volume :
39
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28859766
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2017.01.032