Back to Search
Start Over
Evaluation of pediatric cochlear implant care throughout Europe: Is European pediatric cochlear implant care performed according to guidelines?
- Source :
-
Cochlear implants international [Cochlear Implants Int] 2017 Nov; Vol. 18 (6), pp. 287-296. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Sep 19. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Objectives: International guidelines indicate that children with profound hearing loss should receive a cochlear implant (CI) soon after diagnosis in order to optimize speech and language rehabilitation. Although prompt rehabilitation is encouraged by current guidelines, delays in cochlear implantation are still present. This study investigated whether European countries establish timely pediatric CI care based on epidemiological, commercial, and clinical data.<br />Methods: An estimation of the number of pediatric CI candidates in European countries was performed and compared to epidemiological (Euro-CIU), commercial (Cochlear <superscript>®</superscript> ), and clinical (institutional) age-at-implantation data. The ages at implantation of pediatric patients in eight countries (the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, the United Kingdom, France, Turkey, Portugal, and Italy) between 2005 and 2015 were evaluated.<br />Results: From 2010 onwards, over 30% of the pediatric CI candidates were implanted before 24 months of age. Northern European institutions implanted children on average around 12 months of age, whereas southern European institutions implanted children after 18 months of age. The Netherlands and Germany implanted earliest (between 6 and 11 months).<br />Discussion: Implemented newborn hearing screening programs and reimbursement rates of CIs vary greatly within Europe due to local, social, financial, and political differences. However, internationally accepted recommendations are applicable to this heterogeneous European CI practice. Although consensus on early pediatric cochlear implantation exists, this study identified marked delays in European care.<br />Conclusion: Regardless of the great heterogeneity in European practice, reasons for latency should be identified on a national level and possibilities to prevent avoidable future implantation delays should be explored to provide national recommendations.
- Subjects :
- Age Factors
Child
Child, Preschool
Cochlear Implantation standards
Cochlear Implants standards
Deafness epidemiology
Europe epidemiology
Female
Humans
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Male
Time-to-Treatment standards
Cochlear Implantation statistics & numerical data
Cochlear Implants statistics & numerical data
Deafness surgery
Guideline Adherence statistics & numerical data
Time-to-Treatment statistics & numerical data
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1754-7628
- Volume :
- 18
- Issue :
- 6
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Cochlear implants international
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28925814
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2017.1375238