Back to Search Start Over

Clinical outcomes of temporary mechanical circulatory support as a direct bridge to heart transplantation: a nationwide Spanish registry.

Authors :
Barge-Caballero E
Almenar-Bonet L
Gonzalez-Vilchez F
Lambert-Rodríguez JL
González-Costello J
Segovia-Cubero J
Castel-Lavilla MA
Delgado-Jiménez J
Garrido-Bravo IP
Rangel-Sousa D
Martínez-Sellés M
De la Fuente-Galan L
Rábago-Juan-Aracil G
Sanz-Julve M
Hervás-Sotomayor D
Mirabet-Pérez S
Muñiz J
Crespo-Leiro MG
Source :
European journal of heart failure [Eur J Heart Fail] 2018 Jan; Vol. 20 (1), pp. 178-186. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Sep 26.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: In Spain, listing for high-urgent heart transplantation is allowed for critically ill candidates not weanable from temporary mechanical circulatory support (T-MCS). We sought to analyse the clinical outcomes of this strategy.<br />Methods and Results: We conducted a case-by-case, retrospective review of clinical records of 291 adult patients listed for high-urgent heart transplantation under temporary devices from 2010 to 2015 in 16 Spanish institutions. Survival after listing and adverse clinical events were studied. At the time of listing, 169 (58%) patients were supported on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), 70 (24%) on temporary left ventricular assist devices (T-LVAD) and 52 (18%) on temporary biventricular assist devices (T-BiVAD). Seven patients transitioned from VA-ECMO to temporary ventricular assist devices while on the waiting list. Mean time on T-MCS was 13.1 ± 12.6 days. Mean time from listing to transplantation was 7.6 ± 8.5 days. Overall, 230 (79%) patients were transplanted and 54 (18.6%) died during MCS. In-hospital postoperative mortality after transplantation was 33.3%, 11.9% and 26.2% for patients bridged on VA-ECMO, T-LVAD and T-BiVAD, respectively (P = 0.008). Overall survival from listing to hospital discharge was 54.4%, 78.6% and 55.8%, respectively (P = 0.002). T-LVAD support was independently associated with a lower risk of death over the first year after listing (hazard ratio 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.30-0.92). Patients treated with VA-ECMO showed the highest incidence rate of adverse clinical events associated with T-MCS.<br />Conclusion: Temporary devices may be used to bridge critically ill candidates directly to heart transplantation in a setting of short waiting list times, as is the case of Spain. In our series, bridging with T-LVAD was associated with more favourable outcomes than bridging with T-BiVAD or VA-ECMO.<br /> (© 2017 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure © 2017 European Society of Cardiology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0844
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of heart failure
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28949079
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.956