Back to Search Start Over

Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Multicenter Blinded Randomized Noninferiority Study of 1992 Cases (Pivotal Study).

Authors :
Mukhopadhyay S
Feldman MD
Abels E
Ashfaq R
Beltaifa S
Cacciabeve NG
Cathro HP
Cheng L
Cooper K
Dickey GE
Gill RM
Heaton RP Jr
Kerstens R
Lindberg GM
Malhotra RK
Mandell JW
Manlucu ED
Mills AM
Mills SE
Moskaluk CA
Nelis M
Patil DT
Przybycin CG
Reynolds JP
Rubin BP
Saboorian MH
Salicru M
Samols MA
Sturgis CD
Turner KO
Wick MR
Yoon JY
Zhao P
Taylor CR
Source :
The American journal of surgical pathology [Am J Surg Pathol] 2018 Jan; Vol. 42 (1), pp. 39-52.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Most prior studies of primary diagnosis in surgical pathology using whole slide imaging (WSI) versus microscopy have focused on specific organ systems or included relatively few cases. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that WSI is noninferior to microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology. A blinded randomized noninferiority study was conducted across the entire range of surgical pathology cases (biopsies and resections, including hematoxylin and eosin, immunohistochemistry, and special stains) from 4 institutions using the original sign-out diagnosis (baseline diagnosis) as the reference standard. Cases were scanned, converted to WSI and randomized. Sixteen pathologists interpreted cases by microscopy or WSI, followed by a wash-out period of ≥4 weeks, after which cases were read by the same observers using the other modality. Major discordances were identified by an adjudication panel, and the differences between major discordance rates for both microscopy (against the reference standard) and WSI (against the reference standard) were calculated. A total of 1992 cases were included, resulting in 15,925 reads. The major discordance rate with the reference standard diagnosis was 4.9% for WSI and 4.6% for microscopy. The difference between major discordance rates for microscopy and WSI was 0.4% (95% confidence interval, -0.30% to 1.01%). The difference in major discordance rates for WSI and microscopy was highest in endocrine pathology (1.8%), neoplastic kidney pathology (1.5%), urinary bladder pathology (1.3%), and gynecologic pathology (1.2%). Detailed analysis of these cases revealed no instances where interpretation by WSI was consistently inaccurate compared with microscopy for multiple observers. We conclude that WSI is noninferior to microscopy for primary diagnosis in surgical pathology, including biopsies and resections stained with hematoxylin and eosin, immunohistochemistry and special stains. This conclusion is valid across a wide variety of organ systems and specimen types.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-0979
Volume :
42
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The American journal of surgical pathology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28961557
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000948