Back to Search Start Over

Multidimensional structural variation in the cyanotrichite family of merotypes: camerolaite-3b-F\bar 1.

Authors :
Mills SJ
Christy AG
Favreau G
Galea-Clolus V
Source :
Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials [Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater] 2017 Oct 01; Vol. 73 (Pt 5), pp. 950-955. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Sep 28.
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

A new superstructure of the mineral camerolaite, Cu <subscript>6</subscript> Al <subscript>3</subscript> (OH) <subscript>18</subscript> (H <subscript>2</subscript> O) <subscript>2</subscript> [Sb(OH) <subscript>6</subscript> ](SO <subscript>4</subscript> ), has been refined in space group P\bar 1 with unit-cell parameters a <subscript>P</subscript> = 7.7660 (16), b <subscript>P</subscript> = 8.759 (4), c <subscript>P</subscript> = 11.306 (2) Å, α <subscript>P</subscript> = 108.67 (4), β <subscript>P</subscript> = 83.41 (3), γ <subscript>P</subscript> = 126.64 (2)°, V = 581.6 (3) Å <superscript>3</superscript> and Z = 1, with R <subscript>1</subscript> = 0.0951 (all data). This is the first refined example of a cyanotrichite-group mineral in which long-range order of interlayer anions produces a superstructure along b, although diffuse scattering has previously been reported that corresponds to short-range order. Though the structure shares with other members of the cyanotrichite group a structural unit in which ribbons of edge-sharing Cu and Al octahedra form layers || (001), the superstructure arises from regular alternation of [SO <subscript>4</subscript> ] and [Sb(OH) <subscript>6</subscript> ] polyhedra along rods that lie between the layers, and phase coupling between rods that maximizes the distance between [SO <subscript>4</subscript> ] groups of adjacent rods along a and c directions. This arrangement suggests an alternative nearly orthogonal choice of unit cell in F\bar 1 with parameters a <subscript>F</subscript> = 12.473 (26), b <subscript>F</subscript> = 8.759 (4), c <subscript>F</subscript> = 21.476 (7) Å, α <subscript>F</subscript> = 85.94 (4), β <subscript>F</subscript> = 95.91 (5), γ <subscript>F</subscript> = 92.34 (9)°, which is recommended for comparing this structural variety of camerolaite with other members of the group.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2052-5206
Volume :
73
Issue :
Pt 5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Acta crystallographica Section B, Structural science, crystal engineering and materials
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
28981001
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1107/S2052520617010769