Back to Search
Start Over
Resolve conflicting rankings of outcomes in network meta-analysis: Partial ordering of treatments.
- Source :
-
Research synthesis methods [Res Synth Methods] 2017 Dec; Vol. 8 (4), pp. 526-536. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Oct 17. - Publication Year :
- 2017
-
Abstract
- Network meta-analysis has evolved into a core method for evidence synthesis in health care. In network meta-analysis, 3 or more treatments for a given medical condition are compared, based on a number of clinical studies, usually randomized controlled trials. Often, many different endpoints are investigated, related to different aspects of the patient's outcome, such as efficacy, safety, acceptability, or costs of a treatment. Different outcomes may lead to different rankings of the treatments. We use the existing theory of partially ordered sets and show how the relations between the treatments in a network meta-analysis can be illustrated by Hasse diagrams, that is, directed graphs showing the partial order relations, and by structured scatter plots and biplots.<br /> (Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)
- Subjects :
- Antidepressive Agents therapeutic use
Humans
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Odds Ratio
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Treatment Outcome
Antineoplastic Agents therapeutic use
Carcinoma drug therapy
Depression drug therapy
Drug Therapy methods
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms drug therapy
Network Meta-Analysis
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1759-2887
- Volume :
- 8
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Research synthesis methods
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 28982216
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1270