Outcomes of hybrid procedure for type B aortic dissection with an aberrant right subclavian artery.

Objective: To report our single-center experience of the hybrid procedure for type B aortic dissection (TBAD) with an aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) and the early to midterm outcomes in these patients.
Methods: From December 2011 to February 2016, 16 patients (12 males; median age, 51 years; range, 40-66 years) underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair and extraanatomic bypass hybrid procedure for TBAD with an ARSA in our center. Demographics, coexisting medical conditions, imaging features, operation details, and follow-up outcomes of these patients were collected retrospectively and analyzed.
Results: Duration from onset to hybrid procedure ranged from 5 to 57 days, with a median duration of 17 days. The median duration of stay in the intensive care unit and duration of in-hospital stay was 126 hours (range, 14-450 hours) and 21 days (range, 11-31 days), respectively. The overall technique success rate was 100%. No perioperative death, major stroke, or spinal cord ischemia was registered. Immediate type Ia endoleak was detected in three patients (18.8%) and immediate type II endoleak was detected in one patient (6.3%). One access-related complication occurred, which was a femoral artery pseudoaneurysm requiring compression bandage. Brachial plexus injury was observed in two patients (12.5%) with weakness of the upper extremity. The median follow-up was 33 months (range, 11-59 months). During follow-up, a retrograde type A aortic dissection was found in one patient (6.3%) 3 months after procedure. The occlusion of left common carotid artery to left subclavian artery bypasses were confirmed by computed tomography angiography in two patients (12.5%). They were left untreated for no symptoms. Reintervention was required in one patient (6.3%) for persistent type II endoleak by using Amplatzer plugs to seal the origin of the ARSA 20 months after the operation. There was no recorded death or stroke during the study period.
Conclusions: Our limited experience demonstrates that a hybrid procedure is a viable and relatively safe treatment strategy for patients with TBAD and an ARSA. A larger series of cases with a longer follow-up is needed to substantiate these results.
(Copyright © 2017 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)