Back to Search
Start Over
Attitudes of paediatric and obstetric specialists towards prenatal surgery for lethal and non-lethal conditions.
- Source :
-
Journal of medical ethics [J Med Ethics] 2018 Apr; Vol. 44 (4), pp. 234-238. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Oct 10. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Background: While prenatal surgery historically was performed exclusively for lethal conditions, today intrauterine surgery is also performed to decrease postnatal disabilities for non-lethal conditions. We sought to describe physicians' attitudes about prenatal surgery for lethal and non-lethal conditions and to elucidate characteristics associated with these attitudes.<br />Methods: Survey of 1200 paediatric surgeons, neonatologists and maternal-fetal medicine specialists (MFMs).<br />Results: Of 1176 eligible physicians, 670 (57%) responded (range by specialty, 54%-60%). In the setting of a lethal condition for which prenatal surgery would likely result in the child surviving with a severe disability, most respondents either disagreed (59%) or strongly disagreed (19%) that they would recommend the surgery. Male physicians were twice as likely to recommend surgery for the lethal condition, as were physicians who believe that abortion is morally wrong (OR 1.75; 95%CI 1.0 to 3.05). Older physicians were less likely to recommend surgery (OR 0.57; 95%CI 0.36 to 0.88). For non-lethal conditions, most respondents agreed (66% somewhat, 4% strongly) that they would recommend prenatal surgery, even if the surgery increases the risk of prematurity or fetal death. Compared with MFMs, surgeons were less likely to recommend such surgery, as were physicians not affiliated with a fetal centre, and physicians who were religious (ORs range from 0.45 to 0.64).<br />Conclusion: Physician's attitudes about prenatal surgery relate to physicians' beliefs about disability as well as demographic, cultural and religious characteristics. Given the variety of views, parents are likely to receive different recommendations from their doctors about the preferable treatment choice.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)
- Subjects :
- Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Genetic Counseling statistics & numerical data
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Male
Middle Aged
Neonatologists ethics
Physician-Patient Relations
Pregnancy
Prenatal Diagnosis ethics
Religion
Attitude of Health Personnel
Congenital Abnormalities surgery
Fetal Diseases surgery
Fetoscopy ethics
Genetic Counseling ethics
Neonatologists psychology
Prenatal Diagnosis psychology
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1473-4257
- Volume :
- 44
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Journal of medical ethics
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29018178
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2017-104377