Back to Search Start Over

Prospective, multicentre study of external ventricular drainage-related infections in the UK and Ireland.

Authors :
Jamjoom AAB
Joannides AJ
Poon MT
Chari A
Zaben M
Abdulla MAH
Roach J
Glancz LJ
Solth A
Duddy J
Brennan PM
Bayston R
Bulters DO
Mallucci CL
Jenkinson MD
Gray WP
Kandasamy J
Hutchinson PJ
Kolias AG
Ahmed AI
Source :
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry [J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry] 2018 Feb; Vol. 89 (2), pp. 120-126. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Oct 25.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objectives: External ventricular drain (EVD) insertion is a common neurosurgical procedure. EVD-related infection (ERI) is a major complication that can lead to morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to establish a national ERI rate in the UK and Ireland and determine key factors influencing the infection risk.<br />Methods: A prospective multicentre cohort study of EVD insertions in 21 neurosurgical units was performed over 6 months. The primary outcome measure was 30-day ERI. A Cox regression model was used for multivariate analysis to calculate HR.<br />Results: A total of 495 EVD catheters were inserted into 452 patients with EVDs remaining in situ for 4700 days (median 8 days; IQR 4-13). Of the catheters inserted, 188 (38%) were antibiotic-impregnated, 161 (32.5%) were plain and 146 (29.5%) were silver-bearing. A total of 46 ERIs occurred giving an infection risk of 9.3%. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that factors independently associated with increased infection risk included duration of EVD placement for ≥8 days (HR=2.47 (1.12-5.45); p=0.03), regular sampling (daily sampling (HR=4.73 (1.28-17.42), p=0.02) and alternate day sampling (HR=5.28 (2.25-12.38); p<0.01). There was no association between catheter type or tunnelling distance and ERI.<br />Conclusions: In the UK and Ireland, the ERI rate was 9.3% during the study period. The study demonstrated that EVDs left in situ for ≥8 days and those sampled more frequently were associated with a higher risk of infection. Importantly, the study showed no significant difference in ERI risk between different catheter types.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1468-330X
Volume :
89
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29070645
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-316415