Back to Search Start Over

Efficacy and Safety of Digital Single-Operator Cholangioscopy for Difficult Biliary Stones.

Authors :
Brewer Gutierrez OI
Bekkali NLH
Raijman I
Sturgess R
Sejpal DV
Aridi HD
Sherman S
Shah RJ
Kwon RS
Buxbaum JL
Zulli C
Wassef W
Adler DG
Kushnir V
Wang AY
Krishnan K
Kaul V
Tzimas D
DiMaio CJ
Ho S
Petersen B
Moon JH
Elmunzer BJ
Webster GJM
Chen YI
Dwyer LK
Inamdar S
Patrick VB
Attwell A
Hosmer A
Ko C
Maurano A
Sarkar A
Taylor LJ
Gregory MH
Strand DS
Raza A
Kothari S
Harris JP
Kumta NA
Manvar A
Topazian MD
Lee YN
Spiceland CM
Trindade AJ
Bukhari MA
Sanaei O
Ngamruengphong S
Khashab MA
Source :
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association [Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol] 2018 Jun; Vol. 16 (6), pp. 918-926.e1. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Oct 24.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background & Aims: It is not clear whether digital single-operator cholangioscopy (D-SOC) with electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy is effective in removal of difficult biliary stones. We investigated the safety and efficacy of D-SOC with electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy in an international, multicenter study of patients with difficult biliary stones.<br />Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 407 patients (60.4% female; mean age, 64.2 years) who underwent D-SOC for difficult biliary stones at 22 tertiary centers in the United States, United Kingdom, or Korea from February 2015 through December 2016; 306 patients underwent electrohydraulic lithotripsy and 101 (24.8%) underwent laser lithotripsy. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify factors associated with technical failure and the need for more than 1 D-SOC electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy session to clear the bile duct.<br />Results: The mean procedure time was longer in the electrohydraulic lithotripsy group (73.9 minutes) than in the laser lithotripsy group (49.9 minutes; P < .001). Ducts were completely cleared (technical success) in 97.3% of patients (96.7% of patients with electrohydraulic lithotripsy vs 99% patients with laser lithotripsy; P = .31). Ducts were cleared in a single session in 77.4% of patients (74.5% by electrohydraulic lithotripsy and 86.1% by laser lithotripsy; P = .20). Electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy failed in 11 patients (2.7%); 8 patients were treated by surgery. Adverse events occurred in 3.7% patients and the stone was incompletely removed from 6.6% of patients. On multivariable analysis, difficult anatomy or cannulation (duodenal diverticula or altered anatomy) correlated with technical failure (odds ratio, 5.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-21.2; P = .02). Procedure time increased odds of more than 1 session of D-SOC electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy (odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.03; P < .001).<br />Conclusions: In a multicenter, international, retrospective analysis, we found D-SOC with electrohydraulic or laser lithotripsy to be effective and safe in more than 95% of patients with difficult biliary stones. Fewer than 5% of patients require additional treatment with surgery and/or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy to clear the duct.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1542-7714
Volume :
16
Issue :
6
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29074446
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2017.10.017