Back to Search Start Over

Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis: a multicentre randomised trial.

Authors :
van Brunschot S
van Grinsven J
van Santvoort HC
Bakker OJ
Besselink MG
Boermeester MA
Bollen TL
Bosscha K
Bouwense SA
Bruno MJ
Cappendijk VC
Consten EC
Dejong CH
van Eijck CH
Erkelens WG
van Goor H
van Grevenstein WMU
Haveman JW
Hofker SH
Jansen JM
Laméris JS
van Lienden KP
Meijssen MA
Mulder CJ
Nieuwenhuijs VB
Poley JW
Quispel R
de Ridder RJ
Römkens TE
Scheepers JJ
Schepers NJ
Schwartz MP
Seerden T
Spanier BWM
Straathof JWA
Strijker M
Timmer R
Venneman NG
Vleggaar FP
Voermans RP
Witteman BJ
Gooszen HG
Dijkgraaf MG
Fockens P
Source :
Lancet (London, England) [Lancet] 2018 Jan 06; Vol. 391 (10115), pp. 51-58. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Nov 03.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Infected necrotising pancreatitis is a potentially lethal disease and an indication for invasive intervention. The surgical step-up approach is the standard treatment. A promising alternative is the endoscopic step-up approach. We compared both approaches to see whether the endoscopic step-up approach was superior to the surgical step-up approach in terms of clinical and economic outcomes.<br />Methods: In this multicentre, randomised, superiority trial, we recruited adult patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis and an indication for invasive intervention from 19 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients were randomly assigned to either the endoscopic or the surgical step-up approach. The endoscopic approach consisted of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transluminal drainage followed, if necessary, by endoscopic necrosectomy. The surgical approach consisted of percutaneous catheter drainage followed, if necessary, by video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement. The primary endpoint was a composite of major complications or death during 6-month follow-up. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN09186711.<br />Findings: Between Sept 20, 2011, and Jan 29, 2015, we screened 418 patients with pancreatic or extrapancreatic necrosis, of which 98 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the endoscopic step-up approach (n=51) or the surgical step-up approach (n=47). The primary endpoint occurred in 22 (43%) of 51 patients in the endoscopy group and in 21 (45%) of 47 patients in the surgery group (risk ratio [RR] 0·97, 95% CI 0·62-1·51; p=0·88). Mortality did not differ between groups (nine [18%] patients in the endoscopy group vs six [13%] patients in the surgery group; RR 1·38, 95% CI 0·53-3·59, p=0·50), nor did any of the major complications included in the primary endpoint.<br />Interpretation: In patients with infected necrotising pancreatitis, the endoscopic step-up approach was not superior to the surgical step-up approach in reducing major complications or death. The rate of pancreatic fistulas and length of hospital stay were lower in the endoscopy group. The outcome of this trial will probably result in a shift to the endoscopic step-up approach as treatment preference.<br />Funding: The Dutch Digestive Disease Foundation, Fonds NutsOhra, and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1474-547X
Volume :
391
Issue :
10115
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Lancet (London, England)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29108721
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32404-2