Back to Search Start Over

A survey by the European Society of Breast Imaging on the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice.

Authors :
Clauser P
Mann R
Athanasiou A
Prosch H
Pinker K
Dietzel M
Helbich TH
Fuchsjäger M
Camps-Herrero J
Sardanelli F
Forrai G
Baltzer PAT
Source :
European radiology [Eur Radiol] 2018 May; Vol. 28 (5), pp. 1909-1918. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Nov 22.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objectives: While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered a helpful diagnostic tool in breast imaging, discussions are ongoing about appropriate protocols and indications. The European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI) launched a survey to evaluate the utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice.<br />Methods: An online survey reviewed by the EUSOBI board and committees was distributed amongst members. The questions encompassed: training and experience; annual breast MRI and MRI-guided-intervention workload; examination protocols; indications; reporting habits and preferences. Data were summarised and subgroups compared using χ <superscript>2</superscript> test.<br />Results: Of 647 EUSOBI members, 177 (27.4%) answered the survey. The majority were radiologists (90.5%), half of them based in academic centres (51.9%). Common indications for MRI included cancer staging, treatment monitoring, high-risk screening and problem-solving, and differed significantly between countries (p≤0.03). Structured reporting and BI-RADS were mostly used. Breast radiologists with ≤10 years of experience preferred inclusion of additional techniques, such as T2/STIR (p=0.03) and DWI (p=0.08) in the scan protocol. MRI-guided interventions were performed by a minority of participants (35.4%).<br />Conclusions: The utilisation of breast MRI in clinical practice is generally in line with international recommendations. There are substantial differences between countries. MRI-guided interventions and functional MRI parameters are not widely available.<br />Key Points: • MRI is commonly used for the detection and characterisation of breast lesions. • Clinical practice standards are generally in line with current recommendations. • Standardised criteria and diagnostic categories (mainly BI-RADS) are widely adopted. • Younger radiologists value additional techniques, such as T2/STIR and DWI. • MRI-guided breast biopsy is not widely available.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1432-1084
Volume :
28
Issue :
5
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29168005
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5121-4