Back to Search Start Over

Integrating diverse forage sources reduces feed gaps on mixed crop-livestock farms.

Authors :
Bell LW
Moore AD
Thomas DT
Source :
Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience [Animal] 2018 Sep; Vol. 12 (9), pp. 1967-1980. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Dec 04.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Highly variable climates induce large variability in the supply of forage for livestock and so farmers must manage their livestock systems to reduce the risk of feed gaps (i.e. periods when livestock feed demand exceeds forage supply). However, mixed crop-livestock farmers can utilise a range of feed sources on their farms to help mitigate these risks. This paper reports on the development and application of a simple whole-farm feed-energy balance calculator which is used to evaluate the frequency and magnitude of feed gaps. The calculator matches long-term simulations of variation in forage and metabolisable energy supply from diverse sources against energy demand for different livestock enterprises. Scenarios of increasing the diversity of forage sources in livestock systems is investigated for six locations selected to span Australia's crop-livestock zone. We found that systems relying on only one feed source were prone to higher risk of feed gaps, and hence, would often have to reduce stocking rates to mitigate these risks or use supplementary feed. At all sites, by adding more feed sources to the farm feedbase the continuity of supply of both fresh and carry-over forage was improved, reducing the frequency and magnitude of feed deficits. However, there were diminishing returns from making the feedbase more complex, with combinations of two to three feed sources typically achieving the maximum benefits in terms of reducing the risk of feed gaps. Higher stocking rates could be maintained while limiting risk when combinations of other feed sources were introduced into the feedbase. For the same level of risk, a feedbase relying on a diversity of forage sources could support stocking rates 1.4 to 3 times higher than if they were using a single pasture source. This suggests that there is significant capacity to mitigate both risk of feed gaps at the same time as increasing 'safe' stocking rates through better integration of feed sources on mixed crop-livestock farms across diverse regions and climates.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1751-732X
Volume :
12
Issue :
9
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29198288
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003196