Back to Search Start Over

Rigor and reproducibility in rodent behavioral research.

Authors :
Gulinello M
Mitchell HA
Chang Q
Timothy O'Brien W
Zhou Z
Abel T
Wang L
Corbin JG
Veeraragavan S
Samaco RC
Andrews NA
Fagiolini M
Cole TB
Burbacher TM
Crawley JN
Source :
Neurobiology of learning and memory [Neurobiol Learn Mem] 2019 Nov; Vol. 165, pp. 106780. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jan 04.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Behavioral neuroscience research incorporates the identical high level of meticulous methodologies and exacting attention to detail as all other scientific disciplines. To achieve maximal rigor and reproducibility of findings, well-trained investigators employ a variety of established best practices. Here we explicate some of the requirements for rigorous experimental design and accurate data analysis in conducting mouse and rat behavioral tests. Novel object recognition is used as an example of a cognitive assay which has been conducted successfully with a range of methods, all based on common principles of appropriate procedures, controls, and statistics. Directors of Rodent Core facilities within Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Centers contribute key aspects of their own novel object recognition protocols, offering insights into essential similarities and less-critical differences. Literature cited in this review article will lead the interested reader to source papers that provide step-by-step protocols which illustrate optimized methods for many standard rodent behavioral assays. Adhering to best practices in behavioral neuroscience will enhance the value of animal models for the multiple goals of understanding biological mechanisms, evaluating consequences of genetic mutations, and discovering efficacious therapeutics.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1095-9564
Volume :
165
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Neurobiology of learning and memory
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29307548
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2018.01.001