Back to Search Start Over

Once-Daily Triple Therapy in Patients with COPD: Patient-Reported Symptoms and Quality of Life.

Authors :
Tabberer M
Lomas DA
Birk R
Brealey N
Zhu CQ
Pascoe S
Locantore N
Lipson DA
Source :
Advances in therapy [Adv Ther] 2018 Jan; Vol. 35 (1), pp. 56-71. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jan 08.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Introduction: Directly recorded patient experience of symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) can complement lung function and exacerbation rate data in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) clinical studies. The FULFIL study recorded daily symptoms and activity limitation together with additional patient-reported outcomes of dyspnea and HRQoL, as part of the prespecified analyses. FULFIL co-primary endpoint data have been previously reported.<br />Methods: FULFIL was a phase III, 24-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter study comparing once-daily single inhaler triple therapy [fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI)] 100 µg/62.5 µg/25 µg with twice-daily inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β <subscript>2</subscript> -agonist therapy [budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR)] 400 µg/12 µg in patients with symptomatic COPD at risk of exacerbations. A subset participated for 52 weeks. Patient-reported assessments were: Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms in COPD™ (E-RS: COPD), St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) for COPD, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), baseline and transitional dyspnea indices (TDI) and daily and global anchor questions for activity limitation.<br />Results: FF/UMEC/VI showed greater reductions from baseline in 4-weekly mean E-RS: COPD total and all subscale scores compared with BUD/FOR; differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05) at each time period. FF/UMEC/VI also demonstrated greater improvements from baseline at weeks 4 and 24 in SGRQ domain scores and TDI focal score compared with BUD/FOR. At weeks 4 and 24, improvements greater than the minimal clinically important difference from baseline were observed in CAT score with FF/UMEC/VI, but not BUD/FOR; differences were statistically significant (P ≤ 0.003).<br />Conclusion: These findings demonstrate sustained daily symptom and HRQoL benefits of FF/UMEC/VI versus BUD/FOR. The inclusion of the CAT may provide data that are readily generalizable to everyday clinical practice.<br />Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02345161.<br />Funding: GSK.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1865-8652
Volume :
35
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Advances in therapy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29313286
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0650-4