Back to Search Start Over

Single-center Experience in Treating Patients With t(4;14) Multiple Myeloma With and Without Planned Frontline Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Authors :
Chan H
Phillips M
Maganti M
Farooki S
Piza Rodriguez G
Masih-Khan E
Chen C
Prica A
Reece D
Tiedemann R
Trudel S
Kukreti V
Source :
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia [Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk] 2018 Mar; Vol. 18 (3), pp. 225-234. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jan 05.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Translocation t(4;14) has traditionally been classified as a high-risk cytogenetic feature in patients with multiple myeloma with shortened progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) despite initial response to treatment. Recent data have shown an improved long-term survival in these patients treated with novel agents, such as bortezomib.<br />Patients and Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on our patients with t(4;14) multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib-based induction between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2014 to assess the real-world outcomes of these patients in a tertiary center.<br />Results: Among the 75 patients analyzed, the median PFS was 33.5 months, and the median OS was 69.6 months after a median follow-up of 41 months. Even in the era of novel agents, patients who received frontline autologous stem cell transplant had a better PFS than those who received chemotherapy alone (median PFS, 24.2 months vs. 41.5 months; P = .01). Hypercalcemia at the time of presentation was found to be a significant predictor of progression (hazard ratio [HR], 10.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-26.0) and death (HR, 9.4; 95% CI, 3.2-27.8), and co-harboring of del(17p) by fluorescent in situ hybridization with t(4;14) was associated with a significantly inferior OS (HR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.4-11.4).<br />Conclusion: Even in the era of novel agents, t(4;14) remains a negative prognostic marker. Frontline autologous stem cell transplant remains as an essential tool when treating these high-risk patients, but further prospective randomized studies are needed to determine the most effective strategy for this patient group.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2152-2669
Volume :
18
Issue :
3
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29397346
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clml.2017.12.009