Back to Search
Start Over
Ethical implications of excessive cluster sizes in cluster randomised trials.
- Source :
-
BMJ quality & safety [BMJ Qual Saf] 2018 Aug; Vol. 27 (8), pp. 664-670. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Feb 20. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- The cluster randomised trial (CRT) is commonly used in healthcare research. It is the gold-standard study design for evaluating healthcare policy interventions. A key characteristic of this design is that as more participants are included, in a fixed number of clusters, the increase in achievable power will level off. CRTs with cluster sizes that exceed the point of levelling-off will have excessive numbers of participants, even if they do not achieve nominal levels of power. Excessively large cluster sizes may have ethical implications due to exposing trial participants unnecessarily to the burdens of both participating in the trial and the potential risks of harm associated with the intervention. We explore these issues through the use of two case studies. Where data are routinely collected, available at minimum cost and the intervention poses low risk, the ethical implications of excessively large cluster sizes are likely to be low (case study 1). However, to maximise the social benefit of the study, identification of excessive cluster sizes can allow for prespecified and fully powered secondary analyses. In the second case study, while there is no burden through trial participation (because the outcome data are routinely collected and non-identifiable), the intervention might be considered to pose some indirect risk to patients and risks to the healthcare workers. In this case study it is therefore important that the inclusion of excessively large cluster sizes is justifiable on other grounds (perhaps to show sustainability). In any randomised controlled trial, including evaluations of health policy interventions, it is important to minimise the burdens and risks to participants. Funders, researchers and research ethics committees should be aware of the ethical issues of excessively large cluster sizes in cluster trials.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.<br /> (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)
- Subjects :
- Health Policy
Humans
Research Design
Risk
Ethics, Research
Sample Size
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2044-5423
- Volume :
- 27
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- BMJ quality & safety
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29463768
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007164