Back to Search Start Over

Who's distressed? A comparison of diabetes-related distress by type of diabetes and medication.

Authors :
Wardian JL
Tate J
Folaron I
Graybill S
True M
Sauerwein T
Source :
Patient education and counseling [Patient Educ Couns] 2018 Aug; Vol. 101 (8), pp. 1490-1495. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Mar 07.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objective: We hypothesized that diabetes-related distress would vary by type of diabetes and medication regimen [Type 1 diabetes (T1DM), Type 2 diabetes with insulin use (T2DM-i), Type 2 diabetes without insulin use (T2DM)]. Thus, the aim of this study was to identify groups with elevated diabetes-related distress.<br />Methods: We administered the 17-item Diabetes-related Distress Scale (DDS-17) to 585 patients. We collected demographics, medications, and lab results from patient records.<br />Results: Patients were categorized by type of diabetes and medication: T1DM (n = 149); T2DM-i (n = 333); and T2DM (n = 103). ANOVA revealed significant differences in sample characteristics. ANCOVA were conducted on all four DDS-17 domains [Emotional Burden (EB); Physician-related Distress (PD); Regimen-related Distress (RD); and Interpersonal Distress (ID)]; covariates included in the models were sex, age, duration of diabetes, BMI, and HbA1c. EB was significantly lower in T1DM than T2DM-i, p < 0.05. In addition, RD was significantly lower in T1DM than either T2DM-i, p < 0.05 and T2DM, p < 0.05.<br />Conclusions: EB and RD are higher for those with type 2 diabetes. Thus, interventions to reduce EB and RD need to be considered for patients with type 2 diabetes.<br />Implications: DDS-17 is useful in identifying diabetes-related distress in patients with diabetes. Efforts need to be made to reduce EB and RD.<br /> (Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1873-5134
Volume :
101
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Patient education and counseling
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29525142
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2018.03.001