Back to Search Start Over

Rectal ulcer and pseudomalignant epithelial changes after prostate seed brachytherapy: A rare complication with a diagnostic pitfall.

Authors :
Lee H
Sheuka N
El-Kadi O
Murray BP
Fisher HA
Kallakury BVS
Lee EC
Boguniewicz A
Jennings TA
Source :
Annals of diagnostic pathology [Ann Diagn Pathol] 2018 Jun; Vol. 34, pp. 131-134. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Apr 04.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Implant brachytherapy (IBT) is a well-recognized treatment modality for early stage prostate cancer. Rectal ulcer and rectourethral fistula complicating IBT may cause an alteration of the normal anatomic landmarks. In this context, pseudomalignant radiation-induced changes within prostatic epithelium may be misinterpreted as a primary rectal malignancy. Such challenging and misleading findings have not been described, and may not be recognized as such.<br />Materials and Methods: We present the clinical and pathologic aspects of two patients who underwent IBT for low stage prostate cancer that was complicated by deep rectal ulcer. Both patients underwent extensive palliative surgical resection for disease control.<br />Results: The histologic changes in both cases were noteworthy for extensive necrosis and inflammation of the prostate, associated with loss of recto-prostatic anatomical landmarks. Prostatic glands showed striking radiation-induced atypia and pseudomalignant epithelial changes extending to the rectal ulcer bed, with no residual viable tumor. The first patient had undergone a biopsy of the rectal ulcer bed that was misinterpreted as a rectal adenocarcinoma prior to surgery. The similarity between atypical glands of the biopsy and the benign prostatic tissue with radiation-induced atypia in resection specimen confirmed their benign nature.<br />Conclusions: Deep rectal ulcer complicating IBT may lead to distortion of the normal recto-prostatic anatomical landmarks, resulting in detection of pseudo-malignant prostatic glands at the ulcer base. Such findings may be mistaken for a primary rectal malignancy in limited biopsy material if not familiar to the pathologist.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1532-8198
Volume :
34
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Annals of diagnostic pathology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29661719
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2018.03.011