Back to Search Start Over

Development, validation and comparison of surrogate matrix and surrogate analyte approaches with UHPLC-MS/MS to simultaneously quantify dopamine, serotonin and γ-aminobutyric acid in four rat brain regions.

Authors :
Liu RX
Xian YY
Liu S
Yu F
Mu HJ
Sun KX
Liu WH
Source :
Biomedical chromatography : BMC [Biomed Chromatogr] 2018 May 04, pp. e4276. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 May 04.
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Ahead of Print

Abstract

As biomarkers, endogenous neurotransmitters play critical roles in the process of neuropsychiatric diseases, and neurotransmitter levels in different brain regions can contribute to neurological disease diagnosis and treatment. Due to the lack of a blank matrix for endogenous neurotransmitters, surrogate-matrix and surrogate-analyte approaches have been used for the determination of neurotransmitters to solve this problem. In this study, we capitalised on the high accuracy, precision, and throughput of UHPLC-MS/MS and developed new methods based on the two approaches. Both approaches satisfied FDA and EMA validation criterias after an appropriate parallelism assessment, and they were used to further quantify the three endogenous neurotransmitters, including dopamine (DA), serotonin (5-HT) and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in rat brain four regions (cortex, striatum, hypothalamus and hippocampus) which represent the catecholamines, indolamines, and amino acids, respectively. Comparison of the results in the same rats (n = 10) showed there was no significant difference in DA, 5-HT, or GABA levels between the two approaches (P > 0.05). The concentrations of DA and GABA were highest in striatum and hypothalamus, respectively, and the levels of 5-HT were paralleled in striatum and hippocampus almost 2-fold higher than other regions. This is the first study to compare these two approaches in the determination of endogenous neurotransmitter content in the rat brain, and the surrogate-matrix approach proved to be simple, rapid, and reliable, considering cost, matrix similarity, and practicality.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1099-0801
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Biomedical chromatography : BMC
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29727024
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.4276