Back to Search
Start Over
Emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy as opposed to delayed shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of acute renal colic due to obstructive ureteral stone: a prospective randomized trial.
- Source :
-
Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology [Minerva Urol Nefrol] 2018 Oct; Vol. 70 (5), pp. 526-533. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 May 14. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- Background: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (eSWL) as first-line treatment in patients with acute colic due to obstructive ureteral stone.<br />Methods: Seventy-four patients were randomized to emergency SWL within 12 hours (eSWL group) and deferred SWL later than 3 days (dSWL group). Follow-up included ultrasound, KUB (kidney-ureter-bladder) radiography and CT (computed tomography) scan at 24 hours, 7 days, 1 and 3 months from the treatment. When necessary, repeated SWL (re-SWL) or ureteroscopy (auxiliary-URS) was performed. Preoperative and postoperative data were compared and stone free rates (SFR) and efficiency quotients (EQ) were evaluated. Analyses were performed using SAS software.<br />Results: Complete data of 70 patients were collected. 36 underwent eSWL and 34 dSWL. The mean patient age was 48.7. Mean stone size was 9.8 mm (CI 95%: 8.9-10.8). 25 (35.7%) were proximal and 45 (64.3%) distal. Mean SWL energy was 19.2 kV (CI 95%: 18.5-19.9) and mean number of shocks was 2657 (CI 95%: 2513-2802). eSWL patients needs less auxiliary-URS than dSWL patients (13.9% vs. 44.1%, P=0.039) and less re-SWL sessions (8.3% vs. 32.4%, P=0.093). SFR at 24 hours was 52.8% and 11.8% (P<0.001) and the EQ at 3 months was 79.1% and 57.5% in the eSWL and dSWL group respectively. Patients from the dSWL group spent more time in the hospital (2.21 vs. 1.36 days, P=0.046) and complication rates between the two groups were similar.<br />Conclusions: eSWL is a safe procedure and delivers high SFR even within 24 hours especially for <10 mm stones. It is able to reduce the number of auxiliary procedures and hospitalization.
- Subjects :
- Aged
Female
Humans
Length of Stay
Lithotripsy adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Renal Colic etiology
Time-to-Treatment
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Calculi complications
Emergency Medical Services methods
Lithotripsy methods
Renal Colic therapy
Ureteral Obstruction complications
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 1827-1758
- Volume :
- 70
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 29761687
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03084-9