Back to Search Start Over

Updated Efficacy Analysis Including Secondary Population Results for OAK: A Randomized Phase III Study of Atezolizumab versus Docetaxel in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors :
Fehrenbacher L
von Pawel J
Park K
Rittmeyer A
Gandara DR
Ponce Aix S
Han JY
Gadgeel SM
Hida T
Cortinovis DL
Cobo M
Kowalski DM
De Marinis F
Gandhi M
Danner B
Matheny C
Kowanetz M
He P
Felizzi F
Patel H
Sandler A
Ballinger M
Barlesi F
Source :
Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer [J Thorac Oncol] 2018 Aug; Vol. 13 (8), pp. 1156-1170. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 May 17.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of atezolizumab versus the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as second- or third-line treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC in the primary (n = 850) and secondary (n = 1225) efficacy populations of the randomized phase III OAK study (respectively referred to as the intention-to-treat [ITT] 850 [ITT850] and ITT1225) at an updated data cutoff were assessed.<br />Methods: Patients received atezolizumab, 1200 mg, or docetaxel, 75 mg/m <superscript>2</superscript> , intravenously every 3 weeks until loss of clinical benefit or disease progression, respectively. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in the ITT population and programmed death-ligand 1-expressing subgroup. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of subsequent immunotherapy use in the docetaxel arm on the observed survival benefit with atezolizumab.<br />Results: Atezolizumab demonstrated an OS benefit versus docetaxel in the updated ITT850 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.75, 95% confidence interval: 0.64-0.89, p = 0.0006) and the ITT1225 (HR = 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.70-0.92, p = 0.0012) after minimum follow-up times of 26 and 21 months, respectively. Improved survival with atezolizumab was observed across programmed death-ligand 1 and histological subgroups. In the immunotherapy sensitivity analysis, the relative OS benefit with atezolizumab was slightly greater in the ITT850 (HR = 0.69) and ITT1225 (HR = 0.74) than the conventional OS estimate. Fewer patients receiving atezolizumab experienced grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events (14.9%) than did patients receiving docetaxel (42.4%); no grade 5 adverse events related to atezolizumab were observed.<br />Conclusions: The results of the updated ITT850 and initial ITT1225 analyses were consistent with those of the primary efficacy analysis demonstrating survival benefit with atezolizumab versus with docetaxel. Atezolizumab continued to demonstrate a favorable safety profile after longer treatment exposure and follow-up.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1556-1380
Volume :
13
Issue :
8
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
29777823
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2018.04.039