Back to Search Start Over

Chemical composition and source apportionment of ambient, household, and personal exposures to PM 2.5 in communities using biomass stoves in rural China.

Authors :
Lai AM
Carter E
Shan M
Ni K
Clark S
Ezzati M
Wiedinmyer C
Yang X
Baumgartner J
Schauer JJ
Source :
The Science of the total environment [Sci Total Environ] 2019 Jan 01; Vol. 646, pp. 309-319. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jul 24.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Fine particulate matter (PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> ) has health effects that may depend on its sources and chemical composition. Few studies have quantified the composition of personal and area PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> in rural settings over the same time period. Yet, this information would shed important light on the sources influencing personal PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> exposures. This study investigated the sources and chemical composition of 40 personal exposure, 40 household, and 36 ambient PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> samples collected in the non-heating and heating seasons in rural southwestern China. Chemical analysis included black carbon (BC), water-soluble components (ions, organic carbon), elements, and organic tracers. Source apportionment was conducted using organic tracer concentrations in a Chemical Mass Balance model. Biomass burning was the largest identified PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> source contributor to household (average, SD: 48 ± 11%) and exposures (31 ± 6%) in both seasons, and ambient PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> in winter (20 ± 4%). Food cooking also contributed to household and personal PM, reaching approximately half of the biomass contributions. Secondary inorganic aerosol was the major identified source in summertime ambient PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> (32 ± 14%), but was present in all samples (summer: 10 ± 3% [household], 13 ± 6% [exposures]; winter: 18 ± 2% [ambient], 7 ± 2% [household], 8 ± 2% [exposures]). Dust concentrations and fractional contribution to total PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> were higher in summer exposure samples (7 ± 4%) than in ambient or household samples (6 ± 1% and 2 ± 1%, respectively). Indoor sources comprised up to one-fifth of ambient PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> , and outdoor sources (vehicles, secondary aerosols) contributed up to 15% of household PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> . While household sources were the main contributors to PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> exposures in terms of mass, inorganic components of personal exposures differed from household samples. Based on these findings, health-focused initiatives to reduce harmful PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> exposures may consider a coordinated approach to address both indoor and outdoor PM <subscript>2.5</subscript> source contributors.<br /> (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-1026
Volume :
646
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Science of the total environment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30055493
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.322