Back to Search Start Over

The Prognosis in Palliative care Study II (PiPS2): study protocol for a multi-centre, prospective, observational, cohort study.

Authors :
Kalpakidou AK
Todd C
Keeley V
Griffiths J
Spencer K
Vickerstaff V
Omar RZ
Stone P
Source :
BMC palliative care [BMC Palliat Care] 2018 Aug 13; Vol. 17 (1), pp. 101. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Aug 13.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: More accurate methods of prognostication are likely to lead to improvements in the quality of care of patients approaching the ends of their lives. The Prognosis in Palliative care Scales (PiPS) are prognostic models of survival. The scores are calculated using simple clinical data and observations. There are two separate PiPS models; PiPS-A for patients without blood test results and PiPS-B for patients with blood test results. Both models predict whether a patient is likely to live for "days", "weeks" or "months" and have been shown to perform as well as clinicians' estimates of survival. PiPS-B has also been found to be significantly better than doctors' estimates of survival. We report here a protocol for the validation of PiPS and for the evaluation of the accuracy of other prognostic tools in a new, larger cohort of patients with advanced cancer.<br />Methods: This is a national, multi-centre, prospective, observational cohort study, aiming to recruit 1778 patients via palliative care services across England and Wales. Eligible patients have advanced, incurable cancer and have recently been referred to palliative care services. Patients with or without capacity are included in the study. The primary outcome is the accuracy of PiPS predictions and the difference in accuracy between these predictions and the clinicians' estimates of survival; with PiPS-B being the main model of interest. The secondary outcomes include the accuracy of predictions by the Palliative Prognostic Index (PPI), Palliative Performance Scale (PPS), Palliative Prognostic score (PaP) and the Feliu Prognostic Nomogram (FPN) compared with actual patient survival and clinicians' estimates of survival. A nested qualitative sub-study using face-to-face interviews with patients, carers and clinicians is also being undertaken to assess the acceptability of the prognostic models and to identify barriers and facilitators to clinical use.<br />Discussion: The study closed to recruitment at the end of April 2018 having exceeded the required sample size of 1778 patients. The qualitative sub-study is nearing completion. This demonstrates the feasibility of recruiting large numbers of participants to a prospective palliative care study.<br />Trial Registration: ISRCTN13688211 (registration date: 28/06/2016).

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1472-684X
Volume :
17
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
BMC palliative care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30103711
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0352-y