Back to Search
Start Over
[Cardiovascular safety of DPP-4 inhibitors compared to that of sulfonylureas].
- Source :
-
Revue medicale suisse [Rev Med Suisse] 2018 Aug 22; Vol. 14 (615), pp. 1468-1472. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- After metformin monotherapy, the choice between a sulfonylurea and a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor may be critical in clinical practice. This article compares the cardiovascular safety of these two pharmacological classes based on meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Both approaches show a better cardiovascular safety with DPP-4 inhibitors than with sulfonylureas. However, some heterogeneity exists, most probably explained by differences between the molecules, especially among sulfonylureas as those of last generation (more particularly gliclazide) seem to have a better safety profile. The ongoing head-to-head prospective trial CAROLINA compares the cardiovascular safety of glimepiride and linagliptin in high-risk patients, with results expected in 2019.<br />Competing Interests: L’auteur n’a déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article. Il déclare avoir reçu des honoraires comme orateur, membre d’un conseil scientifique ou investigateur clinicien de la part des firmes AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Sanofi, et Servier.
- Subjects :
- Humans
Prospective Studies
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Cardiotoxicity
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 drug therapy
Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors adverse effects
Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors therapeutic use
Hypoglycemic Agents adverse effects
Hypoglycemic Agents therapeutic use
Metformin adverse effects
Metformin therapeutic use
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- French
- ISSN :
- 1660-9379
- Volume :
- 14
- Issue :
- 615
- Database :
- MEDLINE
- Journal :
- Revue medicale suisse
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 30136463