Back to Search Start Over

Increase in short-term risk of rejection in heart transplant patients receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

Authors :
Nguyen AB
Lourenço L
Chung BB
Imamura T
Rodgers D
Besser SA
Murks C
Riley T
Powers J
Raikhelkar J
Kalantari S
Sarswat N
Jeevanandam V
Kim G
Sayer G
Uriel N
Source :
The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation [J Heart Lung Transplant] 2018 Nov; Vol. 37 (11), pp. 1322-1328. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Jun 30.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: Neutropenia is a significant adverse event after heart transplantation (HT) and increases infection risk. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly used in patients with neutropenia. In this work, we assessed the adverse effects of G-CSF treatment in the setting of a university hospital.<br />Methods: Data on HT patients from January 2008 to July 2016 were reviewed. Patients who received G-CSF were identified and compared with patients without a history of therapy. Baseline characteristics, rejection episodes, and outcomes were collected. Data were analyzed by incidence rates, time to rejection and survival were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves, and odds ratios were generated using logistic regression analysis.<br />Results: Two hundred twenty-two HT patients were studied and 40 (18%) received G-CSF for a total of 85 total neutropenic events (0.79 event/patient year). There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. In the 3 months after G-CSF, the incidence rate of rejection was 0.067 event/month. In all other time periods considered free of G-CSF effect, the incidence rate was 0.011 event/month. This rate was similar to the overall incidence rate in the non-GCSF group, which was 0.010 event/month. There was a significant difference between the incidence rates in the G-CSF group at 0 to 3 months after G-CSF administration and the non-GCSF group (p = 0.04), but not for the other time periods (p = 0.5). Freedom from rejection in the 3 months after G-CSF administration was 87.5% compared with 97.5% in the non-GCSF group (p = 0.006).<br />Conclusions: G-CSF administration was found to be associated with significant short-term risk of rejection. This suggests the need for increased surveillance during this time period.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1557-3117
Volume :
37
Issue :
11
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30174163
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2018.06.009