Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of Postradical Cystectomy Ileus Rates Using GIA-80 Versus GIA-60 Intestinal Stapler Device.

Authors :
Ghanaat M
Winer AG
Sjoberg DD
Poon BY
Kashan M
Tin AL
Sfakianos JP
Cha EK
Donahue TF
Dalbagni G
Herr HW
Bochner BH
Vickers AJ
Donat SM
Source :
Urology [Urology] 2018 Dec; Vol. 122, pp. 121-126. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Sep 20.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objective: To assess the impact on recovery of bowel function using an 80 mm versus 60 mm gastrointestinal anastomosis (GIA) stapler following radical cystectomy and urinary diversion (RC/UD) for bladder cancer.<br />Methods: We identified 696 patients using a prospectively maintained RC/UD database from January 2006 to November 2010. Two nonrandomized consecutive cohorts were compared. Patients between January 2006- and December 2007 (n = 180) were treated using a 60 mm GIA stapler, and 331 patients between January 2008 and December 2010 were subject to an 80 mm GIA stapler. All patients were treated on the same standardized postoperative recovery pathway. After accounting for baseline patient and perioperative characteristics, using a multivariable logistic regression model, we directly compared rates of postoperative ileus using a standardized definition.<br />Results: Of 511 evaluable patients, ileus was observed in 32% (57/180) for 60 mm GIA versus 33% (110/331) for the 80 mm GIA. Preoperative renal function, age, gender, body mass index, and type of diversion were comparable between cohorts. On multivariate analysis, stapler size was not significantly associated with the development of ileus (GIA-60 vs GIA-80: OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.75, 1.66; P = .6). Positive fluid balance was associated with an increased risk (P = .019) and female sex a decreased risk (P = .008) of developing ileus compared to patients with negative fluid balance.<br />Conclusion: The size of the intestinal bowel anastomosis (GIA 80 mm vs 60 mm) does not independently impact the time to bowel recovery following RC/UD.<br /> (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1527-9995
Volume :
122
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30244117
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.09.010