Back to Search Start Over

Quality control of B-lines analysis in stress Echo 2020.

Authors :
Scali MC
Ciampi Q
Picano E
Bossone E
Ferrara F
Citro R
Colonna P
Costantino MF
Cortigiani L
Andrea A
Severino S
Dodi C
Gaibazzi N
Galderisi M
Barbieri A
Monte I
Mori F
Reisenhofer B
Re F
Rigo F
Trambaiolo P
Amor M
Lowenstein J
Merlo PM
Daros CB
de Castro E Silva Pretto JL
Miglioranza MH
Torres MAR
de Azevedo Bellagamba CC
Chaves DQ
Simova I
Varga A
Čelutkienė J
Kasprzak JD
Wierzbowska-Drabik K
Lipiec P
Weiner-Mik P
Szymczyk E
Wdowiak-Okrojek K
Djordjevic-Dikic A
Dekleva M
Stankovic I
Neskovic AN
Zagatina A
Di Salvo G
Perez JE
Camarozano AC
Corciu AI
Boshchenko A
Lattanzi F
Cotrim C
Fazendas P
Haberka M
Sobkowic B
Kosmala W
Witkowski T
Gosciniak P
Salustri A
Rodriguez-Zanella H
Leal LIM
Nikolic A
Gligorova S
Urluescu ML
Fiorino M
Novo G
Preradovic-Kovacevic T
Ostojic M
Beleslin B
Villari B
De Nes M
Paterni M
Carpeggiani C
Source :
Cardiovascular ultrasound [Cardiovasc Ultrasound] 2018 Sep 25; Vol. 16 (1), pp. 20. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Sep 25.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness trial "Stress echo (SE) 2020" evaluates novel applications of SE in and beyond coronary artery disease. The core protocol also includes 4-site simplified scan of B-lines by lung ultrasound, useful to assess pulmonary congestion.<br />Purpose: To provide web-based upstream quality control and harmonization of B-lines reading criteria.<br />Methods: 60 readers (all previously accredited for regional wall motion, 53 B-lines naive) from 52 centers of 16 countries of SE 2020 network read a set of 20 lung ultrasound video-clips selected by the Pisa lab serving as reference standard, after taking an obligatory web-based learning 2-h module ( http://se2020.altervista.org ). Each test clip was scored for B-lines from 0 (black lung, A-lines, no B-lines) to 10 (white lung, coalescing B-lines). The diagnostic gold standard was the concordant assessment of two experienced readers of the Pisa lab. The answer of the reader was considered correct if concordant with reference standard reading ±1 (for instance, reference standard reading of 5 B-lines; correct answer 4, 5, or 6). The a priori determined pass threshold was 18/20 (≥ 90%) with R value (intra-class correlation coefficient) between reference standard and recruiting center) > 0.90. Inter-observer agreement was assessed with intra-class correlation coefficient statistics.<br />Results: All 60 readers were successfully accredited: 26 (43%) on first, 24 (40%) on second, and 10 (17%) on third attempt. The average diagnostic accuracy of the 60 accredited readers was 95%, with R value of 0.95 compared to reference standard reading. The 53 B-lines naive scored similarly to the 7 B-lines expert on first attempt (90 versus 95%, p = NS). Compared to the step-1 of quality control for regional wall motion abnormalities, the mean reading time per attempt was shorter (17 ± 3 vs 29 ± 12 min, p < .01), the first attempt success rate was higher (43 vs 28%, p < 0.01), and the drop-out of readers smaller (0 vs 28%, p < .01).<br />Conclusions: Web-based learning is highly effective for teaching and harmonizing B-lines reading. Echocardiographers without previous experience with B-lines learn quickly.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1476-7120
Volume :
16
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Cardiovascular ultrasound
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30249305
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12947-018-0138-7