Back to Search Start Over

Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flex embolization device with shield technology: angiographic and safety outcomes at 1-year follow-up.

Authors :
Martínez-Galdámez M
Lamin SM
Lagios KG
Liebig T
Ciceri EF
Chapot R
Stockx L
Chavda S
Kabbasch C
Faragò G
Nordmeyer H
Boulanger T
Piano M
Boccardi EP
Source :
Journal of neurointerventional surgery [J Neurointerv Surg] 2019 Apr; Vol. 11 (4), pp. 396-399. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Sep 27.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Purpose: The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) is a routine first-line treatment option for intracranial aneurysms (IAs). The Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (Pipeline Shield) is an updated version of the PED which has been modified to include a surface phosphorylcholine biocompatible polymer. Its early technical success and safety have been reported previously. Here, we assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of the Pipeline Shield for the treatment of IAs.<br />Materials and Methods: The Pipeline Flex Embolization Device with Shield Technology (PFLEX) study was a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study for the treatment of unruptured IAs using the Pipeline Shield. The primary endpoint was a major stroke in the territory supplied by the treated artery or neurologic death at 1-year post-procedure. Angiographic outcomes were also assessed by an independent radiology laboratory at 6 months and 1 year.<br />Results: Fifty patients (mean age, 53 years; 82% female) with 50 unruptured IAs were treated. Mean aneurysm diameter was 8.82±6.15 mm. Of the target aneurysms, 38/50 (76%) were small (<10 mm), 11/50 (22%) were large (≥10 and<25 mm), and 1/50 (2%) was giant (≥25 mm). Forty-seven (94%) were located in the internal carotid artery and three (6%) in the vertebral artery. At 1-year post-procedure, no major strokes or neurologic deaths were reported, and complete occlusion was achieved in 27/33 (81.8%). There were no instances of aneurysm recurrence or retreatment.<br />Conclusions: Our 1-year follow-up concerning angiographic and safety outcomes corroborate previous evidence that the Pipeline Shield is a safe and effective treatment for IAs.<br />Trial Registration Number: NCT02390037.<br />Competing Interests: Competing interests: MM-G serves as a proctor and consultant for Medtronic. SML proctors and consults for Medtronic. TL previously consulted and proctored for Covidien, Stryker, and MicroVention, and currently serves as a proctor and consultant for Sequent Medical. EPB receives honoraria from Medtronic and serves as a consultant for Medtronic.<br /> (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1759-8486
Volume :
11
Issue :
4
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30262655
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014204