Endovascular Treatment of Patients with Isolated Mesenteric Artery Dissection Aneurysm: Bare Stents Alone Versus Stent Assisted Coiling.

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the outcomes of endovascular treatment with bare stents alone versus stent assisted coiling in isolated mesenteric artery dissection (IMAD) aneurysms.
Methods: Patients with an IMAD aneurysm who underwent endovascular stenting between February 2010 and February 2017 at one of three institutions were included in this study. Data regarding technical success, procedure time, symptom resolution, complications, changes in IMAD aneurysm, and stent patency were recorded.
Results: A total of 38 patients (35 men) were included, 27 treated with bare stents alone and 11 treated with stent assisted coiling. Technical success was achieved in 100% of patients treated with bare stents and in 81.8% of those treated with stent assisted coiling (p = 0.078). The mean procedure times were 62.6 ± 5.3 min for treatment with bare stents and 116.4 ± 8.4 min for stent assisted coiling (p < 0.001). A total of 23 patients had persistent symptoms before stenting; all symptoms were resolved within 3.0 ± 0.7 days. No procedure related major complications occurred. Over 30.2 ± 18.1 months of follow up, complete resolution of the IMAD aneurysm was achieved in all patients; good stent patency and in stent re-stenosis were achieved in 65.8% and 34.2% patients, respectively. There were no occlusions of the stented arteries.
Conclusions: Bare stents alone and stent assisted coiling have high technical success rates and demonstrate good intermediate patency in patients with an IMAD aneurysm. Bare stents alone may serve as an alternative to stent assisted coiling for the management of IMAD aneurysm.
(Copyright © 2018 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)