Back to Search Start Over

Living Well: An Intervention to Improve Medical Illness Self-Management Among Individuals With Serious Mental Illness.

Authors :
Muralidharan A
Brown CH
E Peer J
A Klingaman E
M Hack S
Li L
Walsh MB
Goldberg RW
Source :
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) [Psychiatr Serv] 2019 Jan 01; Vol. 70 (1), pp. 19-25. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Oct 24.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objective: Many adults with serious mental illness have significant medical illness burden and poor illness self-management. In this study, the authors examined Living Well, a group-based illness self-management intervention for adults with serious mental illness that was cofacilitated by two providers, one of whom has lived experience with co-occurring mental health and medical conditions.<br />Methods: Adults with serious mental illness (N=242) were randomly assigned to Living Well or an active control condition. Participants completed assessments of quality of life; health attitudes; self-management behaviors; and symptoms at baseline, posttreatment, and follow-up. Emergency room use was assessed by means of chart review. Mixed-effects models examined group × time interactions on outcomes.<br />Results: Compared with the control group, adults in Living Well had greater improvements at posttreatment in mental health-related quality of life (t=2.15, p=.032), self-management self-efficacy (t=4.10, p<.001), patient activation (t=2.08, p=.038), internal health locus of control (t=2.01, p=.045), behavioral and cognitive symptom management (t=2.77, p=.006), and overall psychiatric symptoms (t=-2.02, p=.044); they had greater improvements at follow-up in physical activity-related self-management (t=2.55, p=.011) and relationship quality (t=-2.45, p=.015). No effects were found for emergency room use. The control group exhibited greater increases in physical health-related quality of life at posttreatment (t=-2.23, p=.026). Significant group differences in self-management self-efficacy (t=2.86,p=.004) and behavioral and cognitive symptom management (t=2.08, p= .038) were maintained at follow-up.<br />Conclusions: Compared with an active control group, a peer-cofacilitated illness self-management group was more effective in improving quality of life and self-management self-efficacy among adults with serious mental illness.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1557-9700
Volume :
70
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30353790
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201800162