Back to Search Start Over

Cardiac- versus diaphragm-based respiratory navigation for proton spectroscopy of the heart.

Authors :
Gastl M
Peereboom SM
Fuetterer M
Boenner F
Kelm M
Manka R
Kozerke S
Source :
Magma (New York, N.Y.) [MAGMA] 2019 Apr; Vol. 32 (2), pp. 259-268. Date of Electronic Publication: 2018 Oct 30.
Publication Year :
2019

Abstract

Objectives: To study inter-individual differences of the relation between diaphragm and heart motion, the objective of the present study was to implement respiratory navigation on the heart and compare it against the established method of navigator gating on the diaphragm for single-voxel cardiac <superscript>1</superscript> H-MRS.<br />Materials and Methods: <superscript>1</superscript> H-MRS was performed on a 1.5T system in 19 healthy volunteers of mixed age (range 24-75 years). Spectra were recorded in a 6-8 ml voxel in the ventricular septum using a PRESS (point-resolved spectroscopy) sequence and ECG gating. Water-unsuppressed data acquired with pencil beam navigation on the heart were compared to data with navigation on the diaphragm. Water-suppressed data were obtained to assess triglyceride-to-water ratios.<br />Results: Water phase and amplitude fluctuations for cardiac versus diaphragm navigation did not reveal significant differences. Both navigator positions provided comparable triglyceride-to-water ratios and gating efficiencies (coefficient of variation (CoV) 7.0%). The cardiac navigator showed a good reproducibility (CoV 5.2%).<br />Discussion: Respiratory navigation on the heart does not convey an advantage over diaphragm-based navigator gating for cardiac <superscript>1</superscript> H-MRS, but also no disadvantage. Consequently, cardiac and diaphragm respiratory navigation may be used interchangeably.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1352-8661
Volume :
32
Issue :
2
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
Magma (New York, N.Y.)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
30377860
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-018-0711-y