[Diagnostic value of serum cardiac biomarkers for right ventricular dysfunction in non-high-risk patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolism].

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and troponin Ⅰ (TnI) for detecting right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in patients with non-high-risk acute pulmonary thromboembolism (APE). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 96 adult patients [44 males, 52 females, aged (61±14) years] with non-high-risk APE from January 2015 to June 2016. All patients were divided into RVD group and non-RVD group according to whether there was right ventricular enlargement on echocardiography. The baseline data, serumTnI and NT-proBNP levels were compared between the 2 groups and the diagnostic value of the 2 cardiac markers for RVD was analyzed. Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender, body mass index between the 2 groups ( P> 0.05). The creatinine clearance rate of the RVD group was lower than that of the non-RVD group [96.4 (77.5,99.6) vs 101.7 (95.1,106.5), P= 0.021]. NT-proBNP [2 300 (1 056,3 396) vs 188 (61,535), P< 0.01] and TnI [0.13 (0.09,0.25) vs 0.00 (0.00,0.02), P< 0.01] were significant higher in the RVD group than in the non-RVD group. The univariate logistic regression analyses showed that NT-proBNP (per 100 ng/L, OR 1.199, 95% CI 1.117-1.287), TnI (per 0.01 μg/L, OR 1.164, 95% CI 1.079-1.256) and creatinine clearance rate ( OR 0.968, 95% CI 0.938-0.998) were significantly associated with RVD. Multivariate regression analysis showed that NT-proBNP (per 100 ng/L, OR 1.155, 95% CI 1.074-1.241) and TnI (per 0.01 μg/L, OR 1.079, 95% CI 1.011-1.151) were independently associated with RVD. The areas under the ROC curve (AUC) of NT-proBNP, TnI, and the combination of them were 0.908 (95% CI 0.841-0.976), 0.896 (95% CI 0.826-0.966) and 0.925 (95% CI 0.862-0.988), respectively. The cut-off value of NT-proBNP was 503.5 ng/L, with a sensitivity of 85.7%, specificity of 75.4%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 66.7% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 90.2%.The cut-off value of TnI was 0.05 μg/L, and the sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV was 80.0%, 86.9%, 77.8% and 88.3%, respectively. The optimal probability derived from the logistic regression model in which the 2 biomarkers were the independent variables was 0.779, with a sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 65.7%, 96.7%, 92.0%, 83.1%, respectively. Conclusion: Both NT-proBNP and TnI had preferably good diagnostic value for RVD in patients with non-high-risk APE, but their clinical application needed comprehensive evaluation combined with the overall manifestations of the patients and experimental methods. The diagnostic value was higher when the 2 biomarkers were evaluated together.